Brooks N A
Department of Sociology, Wichita State University, KS 67208.
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(12):1417-24. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90203-o.
A mailed survey of scientists and engineers with disabilities was conducted to investigate how assistive devices for disability utilized in various social settings were perceived by persons with disabilities who also maintained valuable occupational positions. The respondents (N = 595) reported assistive-device utilization in social settings and user attitudes toward using assistive mechanical aids. The minority-group conceptual framework guided analysis of assistive technology as a symbol of disability. Variations in device use within public and private settings and differences in attitudes according to demographic and disability characteristics also are described. Findings show general user satisfaction with devices. Utilization varies among social settings and also varies by disability type, especially between persons with sensory impairment and those with nonsensory impairment. Public responses were not perceived to be problematic, although users do indicate that the actual application of devices may be unsatisfactory. Users' suggestions for further research chiefly propose examination of the systems that develop and distribute assistive devices. Results encourage examination of socioeconomic arrangements that reinforce the minority position of people with disabilities by restricting access to aids perceived as beneficial to social roles.
针对残疾科学家和工程师开展了一项邮寄调查,以探究在各种社会环境中使用的残疾辅助设备,对于那些同时担任重要职业岗位的残疾人来说是如何被看待的。受访者(N = 595)报告了在社会环境中辅助设备的使用情况以及用户对使用辅助机械设备的态度。少数群体概念框架指导了对作为残疾象征的辅助技术的分析。文中还描述了公共和私人环境中设备使用的差异,以及根据人口统计学和残疾特征在态度上的差异。研究结果显示用户总体上对设备感到满意。辅助设备的使用在不同社会环境中存在差异,在不同残疾类型之间也有所不同,尤其是在感官障碍者和非感官障碍者之间。尽管用户确实表示设备的实际应用可能不尽人意,但公众的反应并未被视为存在问题。用户对进一步研究的建议主要是提议对开发和分发辅助设备的系统进行审查。研究结果促使人们审视社会经济安排,这些安排通过限制获得被视为对社会角色有益的辅助设备的机会,强化了残疾人的少数群体地位。