Pehkonen Irmeli, Takala Esa-Pekka, Ketola Ritva, Viikari-Juntura Eira, Leino-Arjas Päivi, Hopsu Leila, Virtanen Tuija, Haukka Eija, Holtari-Leino Merja, Nykyri Elina, Riihimäki Hilkka
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jan;40(1):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
We evaluated a participatory ergonomic intervention process applied in 59 municipal kitchens. In groups of three to five kitchens, the workers participated in eight workshops, and generated and evaluated solutions to optimize musculoskeletal load in their work. An ergonomist initiated and supported the process. By the end, 402 changes were implemented. Evaluative data were collected using research diaries, questionnaires, and focus group interviews. The intervention model proved feasible and the participatory approach was mostly experienced as motivating. The workers' knowledge and awareness of ergonomics increased, which improved their ability to tackle ergonomic problems by themselves. The changes in ergonomics were perceived to decrease physical load and improve musculoskeletal health. As hindering factors for implementation, lack of time and motivation, and insufficient financial resources were mentioned. In addition, the workers expressed a wish for more support from the management, technical staff, and ergonomists.
我们评估了在59个市政厨房应用的参与式人体工程学干预过程。在由三到五个厨房组成的小组中,工人们参加了八次研讨会,并提出并评估了优化工作中肌肉骨骼负荷的解决方案。一名人体工程学专家发起并支持了该过程。到最后,共实施了402项改变。使用研究日记、问卷调查和焦点小组访谈收集了评估数据。干预模型被证明是可行的,参与式方法大多被认为具有激励作用。工人们对人体工程学的知识和意识有所提高,这增强了他们自行解决人体工程学问题的能力。人体工程学方面的改变被认为减轻了身体负荷,改善了肌肉骨骼健康。作为实施的阻碍因素,提到了时间和动力不足以及财政资源不足。此外,工人们表示希望得到管理层、技术人员和人体工程学专家更多的支持。