Zhang Amy Q, Leung Kenneth M Y, Kwok Kevin W H, Bao Vivien W W, Lam Michael H W
The Swire Institute of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Cape d'Aguilar Road, Shek O, Hong Kong, PR China.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2008;57(6-12):575-86. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
Irgarol 1051 (2-methythiol-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is an algaecide commonly used in antifouling paints. It undergoes photodegradation which yields M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) as its major and most stable degradant. Elevated levels of both Irgarol and M1 have been detected in coastal waters worldwide; however, ecotoxicity effects of M1 to various marine autotrophs such as cyanobacteria are still largely unknown. This study firstly examined and compared the 96 h toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to the cyanobacterium Chroococcus minor and two marine diatom species, Skeletonema costatum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Our results suggested that Irgarol was consistently more toxic to all of the three species than M1 (96 h EC50 values: C. minor, 7.71 microug L(-1) Irgarol vs. > 200 microg L(-1) M1; S. costatum, 0.29 microg L(-1) Irgarol vs. 11.32 microg L(-1)M1; and T. pseudonana, 0.41 microg L(-1) Irgarol vs. 16.50 microg L(-1)M1). Secondly, we conducted a meta-analysis of currently available data on toxicities of Irgarol and M1 to both freshwater and marine primary producers based on species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). Interestingly, freshwater autotrophs are more sensitive to Irgarol than their marine counterparts. For marine autotrophs, microalgae are generally more sensitive to Irgarol than macroalgae and cyanobacteria. With very limited available data on M1 (i.e. five species), M1 might be less toxic than Irgarol; nonetheless this finding warrants further confirmation with additional data on other autotrophic species.
烯啶虫胺1051(2 - 甲硫基 - 4 - 叔丁基氨基 - 6 - 环丙基氨基 - s - 三嗪)是一种常用于防污涂料的除藻剂。它会发生光降解,产生M1(2 - 甲硫基 - 4 - 叔丁基氨基 - 6 - 氨基 - s - 三嗪)作为其主要且最稳定的降解产物。在全球沿海水域均检测到烯啶虫胺和M1的含量升高;然而,M1对各种海洋自养生物(如蓝藻)的生态毒性影响仍 largely未知。本研究首先检测并比较了烯啶虫胺和M1对微小色球藻以及两种海洋硅藻物种——中肋骨条藻和假微型海链藻的96小时毒性。我们的结果表明,烯啶虫胺对所有这三个物种的毒性始终高于M1(96小时EC50值:微小色球藻,烯啶虫胺为7.71微克/升,而M1大于200微克/升;中肋骨条藻,烯啶虫胺为0.29微克/升,而M1为11.32微克/升;假微型海链藻,烯啶虫胺为0.41微克/升,而M1为16.50微克/升)。其次,我们基于物种敏感度分布(SSD)对目前可得的关于烯啶虫胺和M1对淡水和海洋初级生产者毒性的数据进行了荟萃分析。有趣的是,淡水自养生物对烯啶虫胺比其海洋同类更敏感。对于海洋自养生物,微藻通常比大型藻类和蓝藻对烯啶虫胺更敏感。由于关于M1的可用数据非常有限(即五个物种),M1的毒性可能低于烯啶虫胺;尽管如此,这一发现有待通过其他自养物种的更多数据进一步证实。