Suppr超能文献

两种毛细力模型之间的比较。

Comparison between two capillary forces models.

作者信息

Lambert Pierre, Chau Alexandre, Delchambre Alain, Régnier Stéphane

机构信息

BEAMS Department, Université libre de Bruxelles CP 165/14, 50 Av FD Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.

出版信息

Langmuir. 2008 Apr 1;24(7):3157-63. doi: 10.1021/la7036444. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

Abstract

Surface tension effects are dominant in miniaturization. Therefore, a lot of capillary forces models have been recently discussed in the literature. The work reported in this paper intends to prove the equivalence between two methods which are very widespread in capillary forces computation at equilibrium: the energetic method based on the derivation of the total interfacial energy and a second method summing both pressure and tension terms obtained from the meniscus profile (based on the Laplace equation). The results are supported by different qualitative arguments, an analytical proof in the case of a prism-plate configuration, numerical simulation, and experiments in the case of two millimetric spheres.

摘要

表面张力效应在微纳尺度中占主导地位。因此,近年来文献中讨论了许多毛细力模型。本文报道的工作旨在证明两种在平衡态毛细力计算中广泛应用的方法之间的等效性:一种是基于总界面能推导的能量法,另一种是将从弯月面轮廓(基于拉普拉斯方程)得到的压力和张力项相加的方法。通过不同的定性论证、棱柱 - 平板构型下的解析证明、数值模拟以及两毫米球体情形下的实验对结果进行了验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验