Verheul Roel, Andrea Helene, Berghout Caspar C, Dolan Conor, Busschbach Jan J V, van der Kroft Petra J A, Bateman Anthony W, Fonagy Peter
Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD), Center of Psychotherapy De Viersprong, Halsteren, The Netherlands.
Psychol Assess. 2008 Mar;20(1):23-34. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.23.
This article describes a series of studies involving 2,730 participants on the development and validity testing of the Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP), a self-report questionnaire covering important core components of (mal)adaptive personality functioning. Results show that the 16 facets constituted homogeneous item clusters (i.e., unidimensional and internally consistent parcels) that fit well into 5 clinically interpretable, higher order domains: self-control, identity integration, relational capacities, social concordance, and responsibility. These domains appeared to have good concurrent validity across various populations, good convergent validity in terms of associations with interview ratings of the severity of personality pathology, and good discriminant validity in terms of associations with trait-based personality disorder dimensions. Furthermore, results suggest that the domain scores are stable over a time interval of 14-21 days in a student sample but are sensitive to change over a 2-year follow-up interval in a treated patient population. Taken together, the final instrument, the SIPP-118, provides a set of 5 reliable, valid, and efficient indices of the core components of (mal)adaptive personality functioning.
本文描述了一项涉及2730名参与者的系列研究,该研究针对人格问题严重程度指数(SIPP)进行了开发和效度测试。SIPP是一份自我报告问卷,涵盖了(适应不良)人格功能的重要核心组成部分。结果显示,16个方面构成了同质的项目集群(即单维且内部一致的组块),这些组块很好地归入了5个可从临床角度解释的高阶领域:自我控制、身份整合、关系能力、社会和谐以及责任感。这些领域在不同人群中似乎具有良好的同时效度,在与人格病理学严重程度的访谈评分的关联方面具有良好的聚合效度,在与基于特质的人格障碍维度的关联方面具有良好的区分效度。此外,结果表明,在学生样本中,领域分数在14至21天的时间间隔内是稳定的,但在接受治疗的患者群体中,在两年的随访间隔内对变化很敏感。总体而言,最终工具SIPP - 118提供了一套关于(适应不良)人格功能核心组成部分的5个可靠、有效且高效的指数。