• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格障碍患者早期变化预测治疗结局。

Early Change as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Patients with a Personality Disorder.

机构信息

Pro Persona Research, Wolfheze, The Netherlands.

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):780-791. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01401-2. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-024-01401-2
PMID:39110303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379748/
Abstract

A significant proportion of patients with a personality disorder do not benefit from treatment. Monitoring treatment progress can help adjust ineffective treatments. This study examined whether early changes in symptoms and personality dysfunction during the first phase of therapy could predict treatment outcomes. Data from 841 patients who received specialized treatment for personality disorders were analyzed. The study focused on whether changes in the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 (OQ-45.2) symptom distress scale (SD), the General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD), and Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP) in the early phase of therapy predicted post-treatment personality dysfunction, as measured by the SIPP and GAPD. Early changes within a specific SIPP domain were the strongest predictors of post-treatment outcomes in that same domain. Early changes in symptoms significantly predicted outcomes in Self-Control, Relational Functioning, and Identity Integration, while the GAPD predicted outcomes in Self-Control and Social Attunement on the SIPP. For the GAPD, early changes on the GAPD itself, followed by early changes on the OQ-45 SD and the SIPP domain Social Attunement, were significant predictors. Thus, when it comes to personality dysfunction, early changes in a specific domain or measure are the best predictors of outcomes in that same domain. While the OQ-45 predicted some aspects of personality dysfunction, it should not replace disorder-specific measures. Additionally, the SIPP domains and the GAPD should not be used interchangeably to predict each other. In sum, considering these factors, monitoring early change can be useful in assessing progress in the treatment of patients with personality disorders.

摘要

相当一部分人格障碍患者的治疗效果并不理想。监测治疗进展有助于调整无效的治疗方法。本研究旨在探讨治疗初期症状和人格功能障碍的变化是否可以预测治疗结果。分析了 841 名接受人格障碍专业治疗的患者的数据。该研究主要关注治疗初期 OQ-45.2 症状困扰量表(SD)、人格障碍总体评估(GAPD)和人格问题严重程度量表(SIPP)的变化是否可以预测治疗后的人格功能障碍,用 SIPP 和 GAPD 进行评估。治疗初期特定 SIPP 领域内的变化是预测该领域治疗后结果的最强预测因素。症状的早期变化显著预测了自我控制、人际关系和身份认同方面的结果,而 GAPD 则预测了 SIPP 中自我控制和社会协调方面的结果。对于 GAPD,GAPD 本身的早期变化、OQ-45 SD 的早期变化和 SIPP 领域社会协调的早期变化是显著的预测因素。因此,在人格功能障碍方面,特定领域或测量的早期变化是同一领域结果的最佳预测因素。虽然 OQ-45 预测了人格功能障碍的某些方面,但它不能替代特定于障碍的测量方法。此外,SIPP 领域和 GAPD 不应该相互替代来预测彼此。总之,考虑到这些因素,监测早期变化可以有助于评估人格障碍患者治疗进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee39/11379748/b19adac848b6/10488_2024_1401_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee39/11379748/b19adac848b6/10488_2024_1401_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee39/11379748/b19adac848b6/10488_2024_1401_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Early Change as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Patients with a Personality Disorder.人格障碍患者早期变化预测治疗结局。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):780-791. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01401-2. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
Severity Indices of Personality Problems-Short Form in Old-Age Psychiatry: Reliability and Validity.老年精神病学中人格问题严重程度指数-短式:信度和效度。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):174-182. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1743710. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
Severity of personality disorders and domains of general personality dysfunction related to attachment.人格障碍的严重程度以及与依恋相关的一般人格功能领域。
Personal Ment Health. 2015 Aug;9(3):195-207. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1297. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
4
Personality Disorder and Changes in Affect Consciousness: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study of Patients with Avoidant and Borderline Personality Disorder.人格障碍与情感意识变化:对回避型和边缘型人格障碍患者的3年随访研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145625. eCollection 2015.
5
The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD) as an instrument for assessing the core features of personality disorders.人格障碍一般评估表(GAPD)作为评估人格障碍核心特征的工具。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):544-57. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1811. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
6
Core features of personality disorder: differentiating general personality dysfunctioning from personality traits.人格障碍的核心特征:区分一般人格功能障碍与人格特质。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Oct;26(5):704-16. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.704.
7
Measuring Personality Problems in Patients With Substance Use Disorders: A Cross-Sample Validation.测量物质使用障碍患者的人格问题:跨样本验证。
J Dual Diagn. 2019 Oct-Dec;15(4):324-332. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1668583. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
Measuring personality functioning in older adults: construct validity of the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning - Short Form (SIPP-SF).测量老年人的人格功能:人格功能严重程度指数简表(SIPP-SF)的结构效度。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jul;21(7):703-711. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1154012. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
9
Relationship Between Affect Consciousness and Personality Functioning in Patients With Personality Disorders: A Prospective Study.人格障碍患者情感意识与人格功能的关系:一项前瞻性研究。
J Pers Disord. 2016 Oct;30(5):633-652. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_220. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
10
The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD): factor structure, incremental validity of self-pathology, and relations to DSM-IV personality disorders.人格障碍的一般评估量表(GAPD):因子结构、自病性的增量有效性以及与 DSM-IV 人格障碍的关系。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(5):479-85. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.778273. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Personalization and Precision Mental Health Care: Where are we and where do we want to go?治疗个性化与精准精神卫生保健:我们现状如何,又将何去何从?
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):611-616. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01407-w. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Borderline personality disorder: a comprehensive review of diagnosis and clinical presentation, etiology, treatment, and current controversies.边缘型人格障碍:关于诊断与临床表现、病因、治疗及当前争议的全面综述
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):4-25. doi: 10.1002/wps.21156.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Feedback Systems in Treatment for Common Mental Health Disorders.常见心理健康障碍治疗中测量反馈系统的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Mar;50(2):269-282. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01236-9. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
3
Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder and Predictors of Treatment Outcomes: A Multivariate Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Data from All Design Types.
边缘型人格障碍心理治疗的有效性及治疗结果的预测因素:对所有设计类型数据的多变量多层次荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 29;10(23):5622. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235622.
4
Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis.利用进展反馈改善治疗效果并减少退出率、治疗时长和病情恶化:一项多水平荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Apr;85:102002. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102002. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Dropout rates from psychotherapy trials for borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis.边缘型人格障碍心理治疗试验的脱落率:一项荟萃分析。
Personal Disord. 2021 May;12(3):193-206. doi: 10.1037/per0000453. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
6
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
7
[Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) early in treatment and disorder specific. Observational study into generic and specific questionnaires to measure the early change in depression treatment].[治疗早期的常规结果监测(ROM)及特定疾病监测。关于测量抑郁症治疗早期变化的通用和特定问卷的观察性研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(2):121-130.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of dropout rates from dialectical behaviour therapy in randomized controlled trials.系统评价和荟萃分析随机对照试验中从辩证行为疗法中辍学的比率。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2020 May;49(3):181-196. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2019.1620324. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation.缺失数据的比例不应用于指导多重插补的决策。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disorder-specific instruments for depression: An assessment in three longitudinal datasets.通用与疾病特异性量表评估抑郁的反应度比较:三项纵向数据集评估。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Jan;36(1):93-102. doi: 10.1002/da.22809. Epub 2018 Sep 6.