Coburn Natalie, Fulton John, Pearlman Deborah N, Law Calvin, DiPaolo Brenda, Cady Blake
University of Toronto, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Breast J. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00542.x.
Few studies have examined the relationship of insurance status with the presentation and treatment of breast cancer. Using a state cancer registry, we compared tumor presentation and surgical treatments at presentation by insurance status (private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured). Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and ANOVA were used for comparison. P-values reflect a comparison to insured patients. From 1996 to 2005, there were 6876 cases of invasive breast cancer with either private (n = 3975), Medicare (n = 2592), Medicaid (n = 193), or no insurance (n = 116). The median age (years) at presentation was 55 for private, 76 for Medicare, 54 for Medicaid and 54 for uninsured. The mean and median tumor size (mm) were 18.5 and 15 for private; 20.9 and 15 for Medicare; 24.2 and 18 for Medicaid; and 29.5 and 17 for uninsured, respectively; (p < 0.001 for all). Fewer women with Medicare and Medicaid presented with node negative breast cancers: private, 73.4% node negative; Medicare, 79.5% (p < 0.001); Medicaid, 60.9% (p < 0.001); and uninsured, 58% (p = 0.005). Significantly more uninsured women had no surgical treatment of their breast cancer: 15.5% versus 4.3% for private (p < 0.001). Among women with non-metastatic T1/T2 tumors, 71.5% with private insurance underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), compared with 64.2% of Medicare (p < 0.001), 65% of Medicaid (p = 0.097), and 65.4% of uninsured (p = 0.234). The rate of reconstruction following mastectomy was higher for private insurance (36.6%), compared with Medicare (3.8%, p < 0.0001), Medicaid (26.1%, p = 0.31), and uninsured (5.0%, p = 0.0038). The presentation of breast cancer in women with no insurance and Medicaid is significantly worse than those with private insurance. Of concern are the lower proportions of BCS and reconstruction among patients who are uninsured or have Medicaid. Reduction of disparities in breast cancer presentation and treatment may be possible by increasing enrollment of uninsured, program-eligible women in a state-supported screening and treatment program.
很少有研究探讨保险状况与乳腺癌的表现及治疗之间的关系。我们利用一个州癌症登记处的数据,比较了不同保险状况(私人保险、医疗保险、医疗补助或无保险)下肿瘤的表现及初次就诊时的手术治疗情况。采用学生t检验、卡方检验和方差分析进行比较。P值反映与参保患者的比较结果。1996年至2005年期间,共有6876例浸润性乳腺癌病例,其中有私人保险的(n = 3975)、医疗保险的(n = 2592)、医疗补助的(n = 193)或无保险的(n = 116)。初次就诊时的中位年龄(岁),有私人保险的为55岁,医疗保险的为76岁,医疗补助的为54岁,无保险的为54岁。肿瘤大小的均值和中位数(mm),有私人保险的分别为18.5和15;医疗保险的为20.9和15;医疗补助的为24.2和18;无保险的为29.5和17;(所有P值均<0.001)。医疗保险和医疗补助的女性中,出现淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的比例较低:有私人保险的为73.4%淋巴结阴性;医疗保险的为79.5%(P<0.001);医疗补助的为60.9%(P<0.001);无保险的为58%(P = 0.005)。无保险的女性中,未接受乳腺癌手术治疗的比例显著更高:为15.5%,而有私人保险的为4.3%(P<0.001)。在患有非转移性T1/T2肿瘤的女性中,71.5%有私人保险的接受了保乳手术(BCS),相比之下,医疗保险的为64.2%(P<0.001),医疗补助的为65%(P = 0.097),无保险的为65.4%(P = 0.234)。乳房切除术后的重建率,有私人保险的更高(36.6%),相比之下,医疗保险的为3.8%(P<0.0001),医疗补助的为26.1%(P = 0.31),无保险的为5.0%(P = 0.0038)。无保险和有医疗补助的女性乳腺癌表现明显比有私人保险的女性更差。令人担忧的是,无保险或有医疗补助的患者中保乳手术和重建的比例较低。通过增加符合项目条件的无保险女性参加州支持的筛查和治疗项目,可能会减少乳腺癌表现和治疗方面的差异。