Razpurker-Apfeld Irene, Pratt Hillel
Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Brain Cogn. 2008 Jul;67(2):183-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
Two types of perceptual visual grouping, differing in complexity of shape formation, were examined under inattention. Fourteen participants performed a similarity judgment task concerning two successive briefly presented central targets surrounded by task-irrelevant simple and complex grouping patterns. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 22 scalp electrodes and source current density estimations were conducted for the net response to the task-irrelevant background patterns, using low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Although participants' subjective reports indicated that neither type of organization induced awareness, electrophysiological results showed they both evoked significant activation in occipital, parieto-temporal and frontal brain areas. Behavioral results demonstrated that only grouping of the simple pattern arose under inattention. In contrast to the complex pattern, the processing of the simple pattern was associated with an initially longer latency and higher activation beginning at 130 ms. These results support the distinction of grouping patterns differing in complexity of shape formation.
在注意力不集中的情况下,研究了两种在形状形成复杂性上存在差异的感知视觉分组。14名参与者对两个连续短暂呈现的中心目标进行相似性判断任务,目标周围环绕着与任务无关的简单和复杂分组模式。通过22个头皮电极记录事件相关电位(ERP),并使用低分辨率电磁断层扫描(LORETA)对与任务无关的背景模式的净反应进行源电流密度估计。尽管参与者的主观报告表明两种组织类型都未引发意识,但电生理结果显示它们都在枕叶、顶颞叶和额叶脑区诱发了显著激活。行为结果表明,在注意力不集中的情况下,只有简单模式的分组出现。与复杂模式相比,简单模式的处理与最初较长的潜伏期以及从130毫秒开始的更高激活相关。这些结果支持了在形状形成复杂性上存在差异的分组模式的区分。