Barbosa e Silva Odwaldo, Saraiva Lurildo C Ribeiro, Sobral Filho Dário C
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UFPERio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007 Dec;89(6):391-7.
Compare exercise tolerance by children and adolescents submitted to treadmill stress test (TST) following Bruce Protocol (BP) or Ramp Protocol (RP), as well as describe velocity and inclination reached with ramp protocol to help set protocol exercise standards.
Observational, case-based study, with history control of 1,006 children and adolescents in the 4 to 17-year-old range who were submitted to TST between October, 1986 and February, 2003, and who concluded one of the two protocols. Those who interrupted their ET for other reasons rather than physical exhaustion, those on medication that interfered in HR and those with physical constraints to exercise were excluded. Statistical analysis of data considered p<0.05 as significance level; with confidence interval at 95%.
Exercise time close to 10 minutes in RP was significantly higher than in BP. HR max reached was higher than 180 bpm in both protocols. Inclination showed to be slightly higher in younger girls in Bruce Protocol. Velocity and VO2 max showed to be higher for all age ranges for those in the Ramp Protocol.
Velocity and inclination reached with ramp protocol may be used as reference to help set ramp protocol exercise, which showed superior on exertion tolerance as compared to Bruce protocol.
比较按照布鲁斯方案(BP)或斜坡方案(RP)进行跑步机压力测试(TST)的儿童和青少年的运动耐力,并描述斜坡方案所达到的速度和坡度,以帮助设定方案运动标准。
观察性、基于病例的研究,对1986年10月至2003年2月期间接受TST的1006名4至17岁儿童和青少年进行历史对照,这些儿童和青少年完成了两种方案中的一种。排除因非体力耗尽以外的其他原因中断运动耐力测试的人、服用干扰心率药物的人以及有运动身体限制的人。数据的统计分析以p<0.05为显著性水平;置信区间为95%。
RP组的运动时间接近10分钟,显著高于BP组。两种方案中达到的最大心率均高于180次/分钟。在布鲁斯方案中,年轻女孩的坡度略高。对于斜坡方案中的所有年龄组,速度和最大摄氧量均较高。
斜坡方案所达到的速度和坡度可作为参考,以帮助设定斜坡方案运动,与布鲁斯方案相比,斜坡方案在运动耐力方面表现更优。