Nakai Keiko, Kikuchi Masayuki, Fujimoto Keiko, Kaneko Yoshito, Omori So, Nakai Kenji, Suwabe Akira
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan.
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2008 Apr;12(2):132-139. doi: 10.1007/s10157-008-0043-8. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
Serum levels of cystatin C have been proposed to be an ideal marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, some reports have shown that serum levels of cystatin C increase independently of GFR. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of cystatin C in monitoring GFR, especially in patients with a malignancy.
Study subjects consisted of 82 patients with a malignancy, 39 patients with a non-malignancy, 31 healthy volunteers, and 206 patients with various degrees of renal function. We measured serum cystatin C, beta2-microglobulin (beta 2mG), and creatinine (CRE) levels in all patients. Serum CRP levels were measured in 21 patients with a malignancy and 28 patients with a non-malignancy whose creatinine clearance (Ccr) was > or =70 ml/min. Cystatin C, beta 2mG, and CRP were measured by immune nephelometry and CRE was measured by an enzyme assay.
In patients with a malignancy, regression analysis yielded the equation: 1/cystatin C = 0.06 x Ccr + 0.710, correlation coefficient, r, of 0.33. The r was significantly lower than in patients with various degrees of renal function. There were no significant differences when the r performed on beta 2mG and CRE was compared between the same groups of patients. In 74 patients with a malignancy, in whom serum CRE levels were < or =1.1 mg/dl, increased levels of cystatin C were observed in 25 patients and increased levels of beta 2mG were observed in 39 patients. In comparing patients with a malignancy and a non-malignancy, the number of patients with an increased level of cystatin C, despite a Ccr > or = 70 ml/min (8/33) or a CRE < or = 1.1 mg/dl (13/41), was larger in the former group than the latter group, although the result was not statistically significant. Similarly, the number of patients with an increased level of beta 2mG, despite a Ccr > or = 70 ml/min or a CRE < or = 1.1 mg/dl was significantly larger in the former group compared to the latter group. Regression analysis between the serum levels of cystatin C and CRP in patients with a malignancy whose Ccr were > or =70 ml/min had a weak correlation (r = 0.31).
The results of our study suggest that the serum levels of cystatin C are not always a reliable marker of the GFR in patients with a malignancy, probably in relation to its nature as a cysteine protease inhibitor.
血清胱抑素C水平被认为是肾小球滤过率(GFR)的理想标志物。然而,一些报告显示血清胱抑素C水平的升高与GFR无关。在本研究中,我们评估了胱抑素C在监测GFR中的临床应用价值,尤其是在恶性肿瘤患者中。
研究对象包括82例恶性肿瘤患者、39例非恶性肿瘤患者、31名健康志愿者以及206例不同程度肾功能不全的患者。我们检测了所有患者的血清胱抑素C、β2-微球蛋白(β2mG)和肌酐(CRE)水平。对21例肌酐清除率(Ccr)≥70 ml/min的恶性肿瘤患者和28例非恶性肿瘤患者检测了血清CRP水平。胱抑素C、β2mG和CRP采用免疫比浊法检测,CRE采用酶法检测。
在恶性肿瘤患者中,回归分析得出方程:1/胱抑素C = 0.06×Ccr + 0.710,相关系数r为0.33。该r值显著低于不同程度肾功能不全的患者。同一组患者中,β2mG和CRE的r值比较无显著差异。在74例血清CRE水平≤1.1 mg/dl的恶性肿瘤患者中,25例患者胱抑素C水平升高,39例患者β2mG水平升高。比较恶性肿瘤患者和非恶性肿瘤患者,尽管Ccr≥70 ml/min(8/33)或CRE≤1.1 mg/dl(13/41),但前一组胱抑素C水平升高的患者数量多于后一组,尽管结果无统计学意义。同样,尽管Ccr≥70 ml/min或CRE≤1.1 mg/dl,但前一组β2mG水平升高的患者数量显著多于后一组。对Ccr≥70 ml/min的恶性肿瘤患者血清胱抑素C水平和CRP水平进行回归分析,相关性较弱(r = 0.31)。
我们的研究结果表明,血清胱抑素C水平在恶性肿瘤患者中并不总是GFR的可靠标志物,这可能与其作为半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂的性质有关。