• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study.

作者信息

Jestin P, Påhlman L, Gunnarsson U

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2008 Sep;10(7):715-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01466.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01466.x
PMID:18318752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With introduction of the total mesorectal excision technique and preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer surgery, the local recurrence rate has decreased and the overall survival has improved. One drawback, however, is the high anastomotic leakage rate of approximately 10-18%. Male gender and low anastomoses are known risk factors for such leakage. The aim of this study was to identify potentially modifiable risk factors.

METHOD

In a case-control study, data from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (1995-2000) were analysed. Cases were all patients with anastomotic leakage after an anterior resection (n = 134). Two controls were randomly selected for each case. The medical records (n = 402) were checked against a study protocol. Due to incorrect recording two cases and 28 controls were excluded from further analyses.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis significant risk factors were American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2 [OR = 1.40 (95% CI 1.05-1.83)], preoperative radiotherapy [OR = 1.34 (95% CI 1.06-1.69)], intraoperative adverse events [OR = 1.85 (95% CI 1.32-2.58)], level of anastomosis <or= 6 cm [OR = 1.39 (95% CI 1.01-1.90)] and severe bleeding [OR = 1.45 (95% CI 1.14-1.84)]. Diverting stoma protected from leakage [OR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.52-0.88)]. Male gender was a risk factor in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis [OR = 1.30 (95% CI 1.04-1.63) and OR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.00-1.58), respectively]. Except for a protective stoma, none of the variables considered as possible targets for improvement, such as postoperative epidural anaesthesia, observation at intensive care unit for more than 24 h, and intraabdominal drainage, proved to be protective factors either in the univariate or in the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

The most important risk factors for leakage were adverse intraoperative events, low anastomoses and preoperative radiotherapy. A diverting stoma is protective and can reduce the consequences when leakage occurs. Further analyses with focus on the surgical technique and individual surgeon may be valuable in identifying targets for improvement.

摘要

背景

随着直肠癌手术中全直肠系膜切除技术和术前放疗的引入,局部复发率有所下降,总体生存率得到提高。然而,一个缺点是吻合口漏发生率较高,约为10%-18%。已知男性和低位吻合是发生这种渗漏的危险因素。本研究的目的是确定潜在的可改变危险因素。

方法

在一项病例对照研究中,分析了瑞典直肠癌登记处(1995-2000年)的数据。病例为所有前切除术术后发生吻合口漏的患者(n = 134)。为每个病例随机选择两名对照。对照研究方案检查病历(n = 402)。由于记录错误,两名病例和28名对照被排除在进一步分析之外。

结果

多因素分析中,显著的危险因素包括美国麻醉医师协会评分>2 [比值比(OR)= 1.40(95%可信区间1.05-1.83)]、术前放疗[OR = 1.34(95%可信区间1.06-1.69)]、术中不良事件[OR = 1.85(95%可信区间为1.32-2.58)]、吻合口水平≤6 cm [OR = 1.39(95%可信区间1.01-1.90)]和严重出血[OR = 1.45(95%可信区间1.14-1.84)]。转流造口可预防渗漏[OR = 0.68(95%可信区间0.52-0.88)]。男性在单因素分析中是危险因素,但在多因素分析中不是[分别为OR = 1.30(95%可信区间1.04-1.63)和OR = 1.26(95%可信区间1.00-1.58)]。除了保护性造口外,在单因素或多因素分析中,没有一个被视为可能改善目标的变量,如术后硬膜外麻醉、在重症监护病房观察超过24小时和腹腔引流,被证明是保护因素。

结论

渗漏的最重要危险因素是术中不良事件、低位吻合和术前放疗。转流造口具有保护作用,可减少渗漏发生时的后果。进一步关注手术技术和个体外科医生的分析可能有助于确定改进目标。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study.直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Sep;10(7):715-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01466.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
2
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.直肠前切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):462-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x.
3
Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk.下消化道吻合术后吻合口漏:男性风险更高。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):579-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03780.x.
4
Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors.择期右半结肠切除术与左半结肠切除术治疗癌症后吻合口漏的发生率及独立危险因素
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Dec;205(6):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.284. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
5
The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage.圆形吻合器作为吻合口漏的一个风险因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jul;6(4):275-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00625.x.
6
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance.结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的危险因素:前瞻性监测结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.019. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
7
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer.术前放化疗及全直肠系膜切除低位前切除术后局部进展期直肠癌吻合口漏的危险因素。
Rev Invest Clin. 2006 May-Jun;58(3):204-10.
8
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素。
Br J Surg. 1998 Mar;85(3):355-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x.
9
[Factors associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection in rectal cancer].[直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏的相关因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Apr 15;47(8):594-8.
10
Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.在一个全国性患者队列中,直肠癌患者行常规直肠系膜切除术后的吻合口漏情况。
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;7(1):51-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Open versus laparoscopic right colectomy: does the initial approach impact on management and outcomein anastomotic leakage? A multicenter cohort study.开放手术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:初始手术方式对吻合口漏的处理及结局有影响吗?一项多中心队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02355-2.
2
Ex Vivo and Simulation Comparison of Leakage in End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Anastomosed Porcine Large Intestine.端端吻合与端侧吻合猪大肠渗漏的体外及模拟比较
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;12(7):676. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070676.
3
A novel technique for low-rectal cancer: Pushing the anus in laparoscopic radical resection.
一种治疗低位直肠癌的新技术:腹腔镜根治性切除术中的肛门内推法
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43267. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043267.
4
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Comprehensive Single-Center Analysis of Colorectal Anastomoses for Ovarian and Gastrointestinal Cancers.吻合口漏的危险因素:一项关于卵巢癌和胃肠道癌大肠吻合术的单中心综合分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2620-2628. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16731-6. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
5
Impact of diversion ileostomy on postoperative complications and recovery in the treatment of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer.分流式回肠造口术对局部进展期中上段直肠癌术后并发症及恢复的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;14(1):26812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78409-z.
6
Transanal Intubation for Preventing Colorectal Anastomotic Failure.经肛门插管预防结直肠吻合口失败。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug 10;2024:5562420. doi: 10.1155/2024/5562420. eCollection 2024.
7
Perfusion outcomes with near-infrared indocyanine green imaging system in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer (POSTER): a study protocol.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中直肠或低位直肠肿瘤的近红外吲哚菁绿成像系统灌注效果(POSTER):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 9;14(5):e079858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079858.
8
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis combined with SEER validation.新辅助放化疗与单纯新辅助化疗治疗局部进展期直肠癌患者的效果比较:倾向评分匹配分析联合 SEER 验证。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(11):8897-8912. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04779-y. Epub 2023 May 8.
9
The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge.结直肠吻合术:一项永恒的挑战。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Dec 9;36(1):11-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756510. eCollection 2023 Jan.
10
Preoperative risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌结肠切除术吻合口漏的术前相关危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022 Nov 28;49:e20223363. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20223363-en. eCollection 2022.