• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的一种决策学习与评估工具。

A decision-making learning and assessment tool in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Sarker Sudip K, Rehman Saif, Ladwa Meera, Chang Avril, Vincent Charles

机构信息

University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9774-6. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-008-9774-6
PMID:18320280
Abstract

AIMS

Making correct decisions is an integral part of surgical competency and excellence. The learning of this expert skill takes years to accumulate during training. To date there has not been an attempt to accelerate this learning process by developing a tool. In our present study we develop a self-appraisal computer software learning and assessment decision-making tool for laparoscopic surgery. It aims to accumulate several years of varied surgical experience, so the trainee can start to learn the complexities of surgical decision making in various types of cases. In this study we aim to validate the tool.

METHODS

Three decision-making modules were developed in a computer program for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: knowledge of operation, operative surgical technique and operative task completion. The latter two modules were based on answering questions based on watching recorded live operations from a library of 100 recorded laparoscopic cholecystectomies of various grades. The questions were devised by two experienced surgeons with more than 14 years postgraduate surgical experience. To validate the tool two groups with varying surgical experience were assessed: intermediate and expert surgeons. These groups were determined by the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed as well as of number of years of operative surgical experience.

RESULTS

A total of 20 subjects were assessed, 12 intermediate and 8 experts surgeons. Mean time to perform the programme was 21 min (range 18-45 min). Using the Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05, construct validity was demonstrated in the surgical technique and completion of task modules as well as the total combined scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our computer-based decision-making learning tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to have face, content, concurrent and construct validities. Surgical decision making is a multifaceted process; by assessing how and why decisions are made effectively, focussed surgical training may be achieved. We aim in the future to determine if the self-appraisal decision-making tool improves or accelerates surgical training.

摘要

目的

做出正确决策是手术能力与卓越表现的一个重要组成部分。在培训过程中,掌握这项专业技能需要数年时间来积累。迄今为止,尚未有人尝试通过开发一种工具来加速这一学习过程。在我们目前的研究中,我们开发了一种用于腹腔镜手术的自我评估计算机软件学习与评估决策工具。其目的是积累数年多样的手术经验,以便实习生能够开始学习各类病例中手术决策的复杂性。在本研究中,我们旨在验证该工具。

方法

针对腹腔镜胆囊切除术在计算机程序中开发了三个决策模块:手术知识、手术操作技术和手术任务完成情况。后两个模块基于观看从100例不同级别腹腔镜胆囊切除术录像库中选取的现场手术录像来回答问题。这些问题由两位具有超过14年外科研究生手术经验的资深外科医生设计。为验证该工具,对两组具有不同手术经验的人员进行了评估:中级和专家级外科医生。这些组别根据所实施的腹腔镜胆囊切除术数量以及手术经验年限来确定。

结果

总共评估了20名受试者,其中12名中级外科医生和8名专家级外科医生。完成该程序的平均时间为21分钟(范围18 - 45分钟)。使用曼 - 惠特尼检验,p < 0.05,在手术技术、任务完成模块以及总分组合分数方面均证明了结构效度。

结论

我们基于计算机的腹腔镜胆囊切除术决策学习工具似乎具有表面效度、内容效度、同时效度和结构效度。手术决策是一个多方面的过程;通过评估决策如何以及为何有效做出,可实现有针对性的外科培训。我们未来旨在确定自我评估决策工具是否能改善或加速外科培训。

相似文献

1
A decision-making learning and assessment tool in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的一种决策学习与评估工具。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9774-6. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
2
Measuring intra-operative decision-making during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: validity evidence for a novel interactive Web-based assessment tool.测量腹腔镜胆囊切除术术中决策:一种新型基于网络的交互式评估工具的效度证据
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1203-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5091-7. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Procedural-Based Assessment tool.使用基于程序的评估工具进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术表现。
Am J Surg. 2010 Sep;200(3):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.025. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.一项针对新手腹腔镜外科医生的循证虚拟现实培训项目。
Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):310-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218094.92650.44.
5
Technical and technological skills assessment in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中的技术与工艺技能评估。
JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):284-92.
6
Integration of Hands-On Team Training into Existing Curriculum Improves Both Technical and Nontechnical Skills in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.将实践团队培训融入现有课程可提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术的技术和非技术技能。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Objective laparoscopic skills assessments of surgical residents using Hidden Markov Models based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions.基于触觉信息和工具/组织相互作用,使用隐马尔可夫模型对外科住院医师进行客观的腹腔镜技能评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:417-23.
8
Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games?训练新手达到标准以及在腹腔镜模拟器上快速掌握技能是否具有预测效度,还是说我们只是在玩电子游戏?
J Surg Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;65(6):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.05.008.
9
Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents' learning curve using hidden Markov model.使用隐马尔可夫模型对腹腔镜手术进行任务分解以客观评估外科住院医师的学习曲线
Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7(1):49-61. doi: 10.1002/igs.10026.
10
Decision making in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, independent and blinded analysis.腹腔镜手术中的决策制定:一项前瞻性、独立且盲法的分析。
Int J Surg. 2008 Apr;6(2):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing surgical object detection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with explicit positional relationship modeling.通过显式位置关系建模增强腹腔镜胆囊切除术中手术目标的检测
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025 Aug 5;28:294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.07.056. eCollection 2025.
2
Defining decision making: a qualitative study of international experts' views on surgical trainee decision making.定义决策:国际专家关于外科学员决策的定性研究。
World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1214-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1089-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
Teaching surgical decision-making: an interactive, web-based approach.教授外科手术决策:一种基于网络的交互式方法。
J Surg Res. 2006 Jul;134(1):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.11.583. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
3
Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中通用和特定技术技能评估的发展。
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.031.
4
Surgical decision-making: integrating evidence, inference, and experience.手术决策:整合证据、推理与经验。
Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;86(1):201-15, xii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.009.
5
Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents.一种用于评估外科住院医师的手术操作评分系统的可行性、可靠性和有效性。
Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):640-7; discussion 647-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.017.
6
Crew collaboration in space: a naturalistic decision-making perspective.太空任务中的团队协作:自然决策视角
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jun;76(6 Suppl):B154-63.
7
The timing of elective colectomy in diverticulitis: a decision analysis.憩室炎择期结肠切除术的时机:一项决策分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Dec;199(6):904-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.07.029.
8
Prospective decision analysis modeling indicates that clinical decisions in vascular surgery often fail to maximize patient expected utility.前瞻性决策分析模型表明,血管外科的临床决策往往无法使患者的预期效用最大化。
J Surg Res. 2004 Aug;120(2):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.01.004.
9
Assessing competency in surgery: where to begin?评估手术能力:从何处着手?
Surgery. 2004 Jan;135(1):6-20. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00154-5.
10
Courses, cadavers, and counsellors: reducing errors in the operating theatre.课程、尸体与顾问:减少手术室中的失误
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):s109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.s109.