Holzer B, Rosen H R, Novi G, Ausch C, Hölbling N, Hofmann M, Schiessel R
Surgical Department, Danube Hospital-SMZ-Ost, Vienna, Austria.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):524-29; discussion 529-30. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9160-9. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
Constipation is frequently a multifactorial disease. This study was designed to evaluate the potential effects of sacral nerve stimulation for patients suffering from severe chronic constipation.
Nineteen patients suffering from pathologic colonic transit time or rectal outlet obstruction were included. Only patients with severe rectal outlet obstruction who needed digital manipulation for defecation or patients suffering from pathologic colonic transit constipation with less than two bowel movements per week were regarded as candidates. A temporary stimulation lead was implanted into the sacral foramen that showed the best muscular response. After an evaluation period, the stimulation electrode was removed. An improvement in constipation (more than 2 bowel movements per week or defecation without digital manipulation, respectively) during the test stimulation, as well as a recurrence of prestimulation constipation symptoms during the following surveillance period of three weeks were prerequisites for implanting the permanent sacral nerve stimulating system.
All of the patients showed a positive motor response to acute needle stimulation. After the evaluation period, eight patients (42 percent) reported an improvement of constipation, and permanent systems were implanted successfully. During the median follow-up of 11 (range, 2-20) months, a significant improvement in the Wexner constipation score was observed compared with the preoperative baseline level (baseline: median: 23, range, 18-27; 12 months after implantation: median, 8, range, 4-13). After successful sacral nerve stimulation, patients also showed a significant improvement in their quality of life.
Patients suffering from severe constipation are a new challenge for sacral nerve stimulation but further research on pelvic floor function is needed.
便秘通常是一种多因素疾病。本研究旨在评估骶神经刺激对重度慢性便秘患者的潜在影响。
纳入19例患有病理性结肠传输时间延长或直肠出口梗阻的患者。仅将那些严重直肠出口梗阻且排便需要手法辅助的患者,或每周排便少于两次的病理性结肠传输型便秘患者视为候选对象。将临时刺激电极植入显示出最佳肌肉反应的骶孔。经过评估期后,移除刺激电极。测试刺激期间便秘改善(分别为每周排便超过2次或无需手法辅助排便)以及在随后三周的监测期内出现刺激前便秘症状复发是植入永久性骶神经刺激系统的前提条件。
所有患者对急性针刺刺激均表现出阳性运动反应。评估期后,8例患者(42%)报告便秘有所改善,并成功植入了永久性系统。在中位随访11个月(范围2 - 20个月)期间,与术前基线水平相比,Wexner便秘评分有显著改善(基线:中位数23,范围18 - 27;植入后12个月:中位数8,范围4 - 13)。成功进行骶神经刺激后,患者的生活质量也有显著改善。
重度便秘患者是骶神经刺激面临的新挑战,但仍需要对盆底功能进行进一步研究。