Michelucci A, Padeletti L, Monopoli A, Fabbri G, Tostiguerra C, Giovannini T, Franchi F
First Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Italy.
Cardiology. 1991;78(4):304-10. doi: 10.1159/000174809.
Several reports indicated a direct relationship between atrial pacing and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) blood levels, but few controlled hemodynamic studies have been reported. In particular, the relationship between increase in heart rate, release of ANP and increase in right atrial pressure (RAP) are still uncertain. Moreover, the effect of accelerated heart rate on ANP secretion in patients with essential hypertension has not yet been fully elucidated. For this, we studied 12 untreated essential hypertensive (EH; WHO stage I-II) and 10 age-matched normotensive subjects (NO) as control by right atrial stimulation (parasinusal site) in consecutive steps of 110, 130 and 150 b.p.m., each step lasting for 5 min. Both before and during stimulation at each pacing rate (after 5 min) RAP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured and blood was drawn from the right atrium for ANP measurements (radioimmunoassay method). During stimulation we observed significant differences in the ANP release in comparison to the initial values: at 130 (p less than 0.05) and at 150 b.p.m. (p less than 0.01) in EH; at 150 b.p.m. (p less than 0.005) in NO. RAP and SBP did not differ significantly at each pacing rate from initial values both in EH and NO. No significant differences in ANP and RAP were found between EH and NO.
(a) ANP release increases in both EH and NO, even if beginning at 130 in EH and at 150 b.p.m. in NO; (b) in both EH and NO, there is no relationship between RAP or SBP values and ANP secretion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
多项报告指出心房起搏与心房利钠肽(ANP)血水平之间存在直接关系,但鲜有对照血流动力学研究报道。特别是,心率增加、ANP释放与右心房压力(RAP)增加之间的关系仍不明确。此外,心率加快对原发性高血压患者ANP分泌的影响尚未完全阐明。为此,我们研究了12例未经治疗的原发性高血压患者(EH;WHO I-II期)和10例年龄匹配的血压正常受试者(NO)作为对照,通过在右心房(窦旁部位)以110、130和150次/分钟的连续步骤进行刺激,每个步骤持续5分钟。在每次起搏频率刺激前和刺激期间(5分钟后)测量RAP和收缩压(SBP),并从右心房采血进行ANP测量(放射免疫分析法)。在刺激期间,我们观察到与初始值相比ANP释放有显著差异:EH组在130次/分钟时(p<0.05)和150次/分钟时(p<0.01);NO组在150次/分钟时(p<0.005)。在EH组和NO组中,每次起搏频率下的RAP和SBP与初始值相比均无显著差异。EH组和NO组之间在ANP和RAP方面未发现显著差异。
(a)EH组和NO组的ANP释放均增加,尽管EH组从130次/分钟开始,NO组从150次/分钟开始;(b)在EH组和NO组中,RAP或SBP值与ANP分泌之间均无关系。(摘要截断于250字)