Sparmann Sarah F, Leander Brian S, Hoppenrath Mona
Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.
Protist. 2008 Jul;159(3):383-99. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
The composition of the dinoflagellate genus Amphidinium is currently polyphyletic and includes several species in need of re-evaluation using modern morphological and phylogenetic methods. We investigated a broad range of uncultured morphotypes extracted from marine sediments in the Eastern Pacific Ocean that were similar in morphology to Amphidinium glabrum Hoppenrath and Okolodkov. To determine the number of distinct species associated with this phenotypic diversity, we collected LM, SEM, TEM and small subunit ribosomal DNA sequence information from different morphotypes, including the previously described A. glabrum. Both comparative morphological and molecular phylogenetic data supported the establishment of a new genus, Apicoporus n. gen., including at least two species, A. glaber n. comb., and A. parvidiaboli n. sp. Apicoporus is characterized by having amphiesmal pores and an apical pore covered by a hook-like protrusion; neither of these characters has been observed in other athecate dinoflagellates. The posterior end of Apicoporus parvidiaboli possessed varying degrees of "horn formation", ranging from slight to prominent. By contrast, the posterior end of Apicoporus glaber was distinctively rounded and lacked evidence of horn formation. Although these species were previously interpreted to be obligate heterotrophs, TEM and epifluorescence microscopy demonstrated that some cells of both species had unusually small but otherwise typical dinoflagellate plastids. The number and density of plastids in any particular cell varied significantly in the genus, but the plastids were almost always concentrated at the posterior end of the cells or around the nucleus. The presence of cryptic photosynthetic plastids in these benthic species suggests that photosynthesis might be much more widespread in dinoflagellates than is currently assumed.
目前,裸甲藻属(Amphidinium)的分类是多系的,其中包括几个需要用现代形态学和系统发育方法重新评估的物种。我们研究了从东太平洋海洋沉积物中提取的一系列未培养的形态类型,这些形态类型在形态上与光滑裸甲藻(Amphidinium glabrum Hoppenrath和Okolodkov)相似。为了确定与这种表型多样性相关的不同物种的数量,我们从不同的形态类型中收集了光学显微镜(LM)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)和小亚基核糖体DNA序列信息,包括先前描述的光滑裸甲藻。比较形态学和分子系统发育数据均支持建立一个新属——顶孔甲藻属(Apicoporus n. gen.),其中包括至少两个物种,光滑顶孔甲藻(A. glaber n. comb.)和微小恶魔顶孔甲藻(A. parvidiaboli n. sp.)。顶孔甲藻属的特征是具有表膜孔和一个被钩状突起覆盖的顶孔;在其他无壳甲藻中均未观察到这些特征。微小恶魔顶孔甲藻的后端具有不同程度的“角状形成”,从轻微到显著不等。相比之下,光滑顶孔甲藻的后端明显呈圆形,没有角状形成的迹象。尽管这些物种以前被认为是专性异养生物,但透射电子显微镜和落射荧光显微镜显示,这两个物种的一些细胞具有异常小但其他方面典型的甲藻质体。在该属中,任何特定细胞中的质体数量和密度差异很大,但质体几乎总是集中在细胞的后端或细胞核周围。这些底栖物种中存在隐蔽的光合质体表明,光合作用在甲藻中的分布可能比目前所认为的要广泛得多。