• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计共担责任的医疗保险市场架构:来自加利福尼亚州的见解

Designing health insurance market constructs for shared responsibility: insights from California.

作者信息

Curtis Rick, Neuschler Ed

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy Solutions in Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w431-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w431. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w431
PMID:19318367
Abstract

Moving toward universal participation in health insurance using a "shared responsibility" approach requires new, more accessible, and more efficient ways for people who are not offered employer coverage to obtain coverage. California's recent health reform plan-which failed to pass-incorporated individual market reform and choice-pool constructs to achieve critically important risk spreading, assure solvency, and reduce cost shifts. These measures, as well as the considerations that led to their design, offer important insights for health reform at the federal level.

摘要

采用“共同责任”方式迈向全民医保参与,需要为未获得雇主医保覆盖的人群提供新的、更便捷且更高效的途径来获取医保。加利福尼亚州近期的医保改革计划(该计划未获通过)纳入了个人市场改革和选择池架构,以实现至关重要的风险分摊、确保偿付能力并减少成本转嫁。这些举措以及促成其设计的考量因素,为联邦层面的医保改革提供了重要的见解。

相似文献

1
Designing health insurance market constructs for shared responsibility: insights from California.设计共担责任的医疗保险市场架构:来自加利福尼亚州的见解
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w431-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w431. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
2
The long and winding road: reflections on California's 'year of health reform'.漫长而曲折的道路:对加利福尼亚州“医疗改革之年”的反思
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w446-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w446. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
3
Affording shared responsibility for universal coverage: insights from California.承担全民医保的共同责任:来自加利福尼亚州的见解
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w417-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w417. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
4
Will Americans support the individual mandate?美国人会支持个人强制医保规定吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w501-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w501. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
5
Consider it done? The likely efficacy of mandates for health insurance.就这么定了?医疗保险强制令可能产生的效果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):1612-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1612.
6
Moving forward in Minnesota.在明尼苏达州继续前进。
Minn Med. 2010 Jun;93(6):36-7.
7
A win-win approach to financing health care reform.医疗保健改革融资的双赢方法。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 2;361(1):4-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904855. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
8
A road map for universal coverage: finding a pass through the financial mountains.全民医保路线图:寻找穿越金融高山之路。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Apr;33(2):155-97. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-052.
9
Reflections on reform. A question of value.关于改革的思考。价值问题。
Minn Med. 2010 Feb;93(2):29-30.
10
Investing in health care reform.投资医疗保健改革。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):852-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0900309. Epub 2009 Feb 18.