Colombo Mara, Giarola Monica, Mariani Luigi, Ripamonti Carla B, De Benedetti Virna, Sardella Michele, Losa Marco, Manoukian Siranoush, Peissel Bernard, Pierotti Marco A, Pilotti Silvana, Radice Paolo
Unit of Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Mod Pathol. 2008 Oct;21(10):1262-70. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.43. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
Most familial breast cancers arise in patients who tested negative for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (also referred to as BRCAX cases). Several studies aimed to define histopathological and molecular profiles characteristic of BRCA1, BRCA2 and BRCAX tumors have been performed. Major pathological and immunohistochemical differences have been reported in BRCA1 cancers compared to the other two groups, whereas less difference has been observed between BRCA2 and BRCAX cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of selected tumor markers to discriminate BRCAX breast cancers from cancers arising in carriers of mutations in BRCA genes, and their usefulness in selecting familial cases in whom testing for such mutations is more likely to result uninformative. We carried out a morphological and immunohistochemical analysis on 22 BRCA1, 16 BRCA2 and 33 BRCAX familial breast cancers. Age at first diagnosis, histological type and grade, and immunostaining for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, HER2/Neu, E-cadherin and cyclin D1 were investigated. The occurrence of somatic mutations of the TP53 gene was also verified. BRCA1 tumors resulted clearly distinguishable from BRCAX cases, occurring at a younger age, being more frequently of higher grade, negative for ER, PR and cyclin D1 expression and positive for p53 alterations. The predictive value of age at diagnosis, histological grade and PR expression was confirmed in a multivariable analysis. When comparing BRCA2 with BRCAX tumors, the only parameter that differed was cyclin D1, which was significantly overexpressed in BRCA2 cases both in the univariable and the multivariable analyses. If confirmed by further studies, our observations indicate that the investigation of cyclin D1 expression in familial breast cancer cases could be used, in conjunction with the analysis of other tumor markers preferentially associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 tumors, to prioritize hereditary cases for mutation testing in BRCA genes.
大多数家族性乳腺癌发生在BRCA1和BRCA2基因种系突变检测呈阴性的患者中(也称为BRCAX病例)。已经开展了多项研究,旨在确定BRCA1、BRCA2和BRCAX肿瘤的组织病理学和分子特征。与其他两组相比,BRCA1癌症报告有主要的病理和免疫组化差异,而BRCA2和BRCAX病例之间观察到的差异较小。本研究的目的是调查所选肿瘤标志物区分BRCAX乳腺癌与BRCA基因突变携带者发生的癌症的能力,以及它们在选择进行此类突变检测可能无信息价值的家族性病例中的有用性。我们对22例BRCA1、16例BRCA2和33例BRCAX家族性乳腺癌进行了形态学和免疫组化分析。研究了首次诊断时的年龄、组织学类型和分级,以及雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、p53、HER2/Neu、E-钙黏蛋白和细胞周期蛋白D1的免疫染色情况。还验证了TP53基因体细胞突变的发生情况。BRCA1肿瘤与BRCAX病例明显不同,发病年龄较轻,更常见为高级别,ER、PR和细胞周期蛋白D1表达阴性,p53改变阳性。诊断年龄、组织学分级和PR表达的预测价值在多变量分析中得到证实。当比较BRCA2与BRCAX肿瘤时,唯一不同的参数是细胞周期蛋白D1,在单变量和多变量分析中,BRCA2病例中均显著过表达。如果进一步研究得到证实,我们的观察结果表明,在家族性乳腺癌病例中,细胞周期蛋白D1表达的研究可与优先与BRCA1或BRCA2肿瘤相关的其他肿瘤标志物分析相结合,以确定遗传性病例进行BRCA基因突变检测的优先级。