Suppr超能文献

米氮平与阿米替林治疗合并抑郁症的酒精使用障碍患者的有效性和耐受性:一项随机双盲研究

Effectiveness and tolerability of mirtazapine and amitriptyline in alcoholic patients with co-morbid depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind study.

作者信息

Altintoprak A Ender, Zorlu Nabi, Coskunol Hakan, Akdeniz Fisun, Kitapcioglu Gul

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;23(4):313-9. doi: 10.1002/hup.935.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Studies indicate that serotoninergic and noradrenergic pathophysiological mechanisms may underlie both alcohol abuse/dependence and depressive disorder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of two serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressant drugs-mirtazapine and amitriptyline, for the treatment of patients with alcohol dependence co-morbid with depressive disorder in a randomized, double-blind treatment setting.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were included in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to mirtazapine and twenty to amitriptyline groups. Thirty-six of them completed the study. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and alcohol craving questionnaire were used at baseline and, at days 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 to estimate the effectiveness of the antidepressant treatment. Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) was used in the assessment of alcohol dependence. The tolerability was assessed with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU).

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in HDRS and alcohol craving scores with both the drugs. However there were no statistical differences between treatment groups. Mirtazapine was tolerated better than amitriptyline treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment with either mirtazapine or amitriptyline resulted with the reduction of HDRS and craving scores. The side-effect profile of mirtazapine was relatively favorable in our study.

摘要

目的

研究表明,血清素能和去甲肾上腺素能的病理生理机制可能是酒精滥用/依赖和抑郁症的基础。本研究的目的是在随机、双盲治疗环境中,评估和比较两种血清素能和去甲肾上腺素能抗抑郁药物——米氮平和阿米替林,用于治疗合并抑郁症的酒精依赖患者的有效性和耐受性。

方法

44名患者纳入研究。24名患者随机分为米氮平组,20名分为阿米替林组。其中36名完成研究。在基线时以及第7、14、28、42和56天使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)、斯皮尔伯格状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)和酒精渴望问卷来评估抗抑郁治疗的有效性。密歇根酒精ism筛查测试(MAST)用于评估酒精依赖。使用临床研究副作用评定量表(UKU)评估耐受性。

结果

两种药物治疗后HDRS和酒精渴望评分均有显著改善。然而,治疗组之间无统计学差异。米氮平的耐受性优于阿米替林治疗。

结论

米氮平或阿米替林治疗均导致HDRS和渴望评分降低。在我们的研究中,米氮平的副作用相对较好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验