Suppr超能文献

Gow-Gates技术:一项关于拔牙程序的初步研究及临床评估与回顾

Gow-Gates technique: a pilot study for extraction procedures with clinical evaluation and review.

作者信息

Kohler Bernhard Rolf, Castellón Loreto, Laissle Germán

机构信息

Oral Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, University Mayor, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 2008 Spring;55(1):2-8. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[2:GTAPSF]2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 2 different volumes of anesthetic solution for a premolar-molar extraction, and to determine the onset of complete mandibular conduction anesthesia via a Gow-Gates mandibular block. One operator performed 32 blocks with a 27-gauge needle on patients who required a dental extraction: 16 blocks using 1.8 mL of anesthetic solution, and 16 blocks using 3.6 mL of anesthetic solution. The parameters evaluated were frequency of successful anesthesia and onset of complete anesthesia. Significant differences (P < .005) were observed in the evaluation of volume: the 3.6 mL group yielded a higher success rate (82.5%) than the 1.8 mL group (17.5%). The onset of complete conduction anesthesia was achieved in 8 minutes by 56% of the subjects (9 of 16) with 3.6 mL and only one subject in 16 (6%) with 1.8 mL. A larger volume of anesthetic solution (3.6 mL) is required to achieve a higher success rate and a faster onset of action for a dental extraction without the use of reinforcement anesthesia. The volume of anesthetic solution is indirectly proportional to the onset of complete anesthesia. A premolar-molar extraction can be done, with 3.6 mL of anesthetic solution, in more than 50% of the patients 8 minutes after injection.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种不同体积麻醉溶液用于前磨牙-磨牙拔除术的效果,并通过Gow-Gates下颌阻滞确定完全下颌传导麻醉的起效时间。一名操作人员使用27号针头对需要拔牙的患者进行了32次阻滞:16次阻滞使用1.8 mL麻醉溶液,16次阻滞使用3.6 mL麻醉溶液。评估的参数为麻醉成功率和完全麻醉的起效时间。在体积评估中观察到显著差异(P <.005):3.6 mL组的成功率(82.5%)高于1.8 mL组(17.5%)。使用3.6 mL麻醉溶液时,56%的受试者(16名中的9名)在8分钟内实现了完全传导麻醉,而使用1.8 mL麻醉溶液时,16名受试者中只有1名(6%)在8分钟内实现了完全传导麻醉。在不使用强化麻醉的情况下,需要更大体积的麻醉溶液(3.6 mL)才能获得更高的成功率和更快的起效时间。麻醉溶液的体积与完全麻醉的起效时间成反比。注射后8分钟内,超过50%的患者使用3.6 mL麻醉溶液即可完成前磨牙-磨牙拔除术。

相似文献

1
Gow-Gates technique: a pilot study for extraction procedures with clinical evaluation and review.
Anesth Prog. 2008 Spring;55(1):2-8. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[2:GTAPSF]2.0.CO;2.
4
Comparison of the Gow-Gates mandibular block and inferior alveolar nerve block using a standardized protocol.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 Feb;105(2):139-46. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60335-1.
6
9
The efficacy of supplemental intraosseous anesthesia after insufficient mandibular block.
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2005 Feb;5(1):57-60. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2005.3336.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Nishit-Rama Modification of a Gow-Gates Technique for Giving Mandibular Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Jun;22(2):359-364. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01901-y. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
5
Evaluation of different mandibular blocks for the removal of lower third molars: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):2129-2139. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03525-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
6
Volume of Anesthetic Agents and IANB Success: A Systematic Review.
Anesth Prog. 2018 Spring;65(1):16-23. doi: 10.2344/anpr-65-01-03.
7
4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar;17(1):29-35. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.29. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
9
Inferior alveolar nerve block: Alternative technique.
Anesth Essays Res. 2012 Jan-Jun;6(1):53-7. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.103375.
10
Anesthetic technique for inferior alveolar nerve block: a new approach.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):11-5. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000100004.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical technics in administration of local anesthetic agents; questions and answers.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1949 Apr;38(4):444-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1949.0003.
2
Design and preliminary evaluation of an extraoral Gow-Gates guiding device.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jun;85(6):661-4. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90032-4.
5
The anatomy of mandibular anesthesia: review and analysis.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Aug;54(2):148-53. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90209-2.
6
Clinical evaluation of the Gow-Gates block in children.
Anesth Prog. 1981 Jul-Aug;28(4):106-9.
8
An assessment of the Gow-Gates mandibular block for third molar surgery.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1981 Jul;103(1):37-41. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0467.
9
The Gow-Gates mandibular block. Evaluation after 4,275 cases.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 May;51(5):463-7. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(81)90001-3.
10
A comparative study of the Gow-Gates technique and a standard technique for mandibular anesthesia.
J Endod. 1984 Apr;10(4):158-63. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80120-X.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验