Galani Irene, Kontopidou Flora, Souli Maria, Rekatsina Panagiota-Danai, Koratzanis Evangelos, Deliolanis John, Giamarellou Helen
Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology Section, Athens University School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 May;31(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
The accuracy of disk susceptibility methods for colistin against 778 bacterial pathogens was evaluated in comparison with Etest using interpretive criteria available from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Colistin exhibited excellent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli isolates (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of the organisms (MIC(90))=0.5 mg/L), whilst it was less active both against Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC for 50% of the organisms (MIC(50))=0.5 mg/L, MIC(90)=16 mg/L). Colistin also showed good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC(90)=2 mg/L, MIC(50)=1 mg/L) but poor activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC(50)=8 mg/L, MIC(90)=128 mg/L). Only 0.8% of minor errors were observed between the studied methods for P. aeruginosa isolates when the CLSI criteria were applied. All A. baumannii isolates with a zone diameter < or =12 mm were resistant and those with a zone diameter > or =14 mm were susceptible according to MIC breakpoints established by the CLSI. Among nine isolates exhibiting a zone diameter of 13 mm, one was resistant to colistin (MIC=8 mg/L) and eight isolates were susceptible (MIC=0.5 mg/L). Applying a MIC breakpoint of < or =2 mg/L for susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae, all isolates with a zone diameter > or =14 mm were susceptible, whilst all isolates with a zone diameter < or =11 mm were resistant. Among isolates with zone diameters of 12-13 mm, 59% were characterised as susceptible. Major errors were observed only in K. pneumoniae isolates at a rate of 0.8%. The poor agar diffusion characteristics of colistin limit the predictive accuracy of the disk diffusion test and consequently values of 12-13 mm should be confirmed with MIC determination by Etest or broth dilution method.
使用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的解释标准,将多黏菌素对778种细菌病原体的纸片药敏方法的准确性与Etest进行比较评估。多黏菌素对鲍曼不动杆菌和大肠埃希菌分离株表现出优异活性(90%菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC(90))=0.5mg/L),而对肠杆菌属和肺炎克雷伯菌活性较低(50%菌株的MIC(MIC(50))=0.5mg/L,MIC(90)=16mg/L)。多黏菌素对铜绿假单胞菌也表现出良好活性(MIC(90)=2mg/L,MIC(50)=1mg/L),但对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌活性较差(MIC(50)=8mg/L,MIC(90)=128mg/L)。应用CLSI标准时,在研究的铜绿假单胞菌分离株方法之间仅观察到0.8%的小误差。根据CLSI确定的MIC断点,所有抑菌圈直径≤12mm的鲍曼不动杆菌分离株均耐药,抑菌圈直径≥14mm的分离株均敏感。在9株抑菌圈直径为13mm的分离株中,1株对多黏菌素耐药(MIC=8mg/L),8株敏感(MIC=0.5mg/L)。对肠杆菌科细菌应用≤2mg/L的MIC断点判定药敏,所有抑菌圈直径≥14mm的分离株均敏感,而所有抑菌圈直径≤11mm的分离株均耐药。在抑菌圈直径为12 - 13mm的分离株中,59%被判定为敏感。仅在肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中观察到0.8%的大误差。多黏菌素较差的琼脂扩散特性限制了纸片扩散试验的预测准确性,因此抑菌圈直径为12 - 13mm的值应以Etest或肉汤稀释法测定MIC来确认。