Brown Michael A, Stopa Lusia
School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Behav Ther. 2008 Mar;39(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.04.004. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
This exploratory study examined the relationship between the looming maladaptive style (i.e., an enduring and traitlike cognitive pattern to appraise threat as rapidly rising in risk, progressively worsening, or actively speeding up and accelerating) and three different aspects of trait social anxiety (i.e., fear of negative evaluation, social interaction anxiety, and public scrutiny fears) as well as general anxiety and depression. A large nonclinical, female-only sample (n=152) completed the Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire-II (Riskind, J. H., Williams, N. L., Theodore, L. G., Chrosniak, L. D., & Cortina, J. M. (2000). The looming maladaptive style: Anxiety, danger, and schematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 837-852), which assesses two types of looming vulnerability: social (i.e., looming appraisals in response to potentially threatening social situations) and physical (i.e., looming appraisals in response to potentially threatening physical stimuli). Multiple regression analyses indicated that social looming uniquely predicted fear of negative evaluation, social interaction anxiety, and public scrutiny fears, accounting for 7%, 4%, and 3% of the variance, respectively. However, social looming did not predict depression. These findings support the looming model of anxiety and encourage further attention to the possible role of social looming as an anxiety-specific vulnerability factor in social anxiety.
这项探索性研究考察了迫近适应不良风格(即一种持久的、类似特质的认知模式,将威胁评估为风险迅速上升、逐渐恶化或积极加速)与特质社交焦虑的三个不同方面(即对负面评价的恐惧、社交互动焦虑和对公众审视的恐惧)以及一般焦虑和抑郁之间的关系。一个大型的非临床、仅限女性的样本(n = 152)完成了迫近适应不良风格问卷-II(Riskind, J. H., Williams, N. L., Theodore, L. G., Chrosniak, L. D., & Cortina, J. M.(2000)。迫近适应不良风格:焦虑、危险和图式加工。《人格与社会心理学杂志》,79,837 - 852),该问卷评估两种类型的迫近易感性:社交方面(即对潜在威胁性社交情境做出的迫近评估)和身体方面(即对潜在威胁性身体刺激做出的迫近评估)。多元回归分析表明,社交迫近独特地预测了对负面评价的恐惧、社交互动焦虑和对公众审视的恐惧,分别解释了7%、4%和3%的方差变异。然而,社交迫近并未预测抑郁。这些发现支持了焦虑的迫近模型,并鼓励进一步关注社交迫近作为社交焦虑中特定于焦虑的易感性因素的可能作用。