Chee Heng Leng
Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 469A Tower Block #10-01, Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 259770.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 May;66(10):2145-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.036. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
The recent history of healthcare privatisation and corporatisation in Malaysia, an upper middle-income developing country, highlights the complicit role of the state in the rise of corporate healthcare. Following upon the country's privatisation policy in the 1980s, private capital made significant inroads into the healthcare provider sector. This paper explores the various ownership interests in healthcare provision: statist capital, rentier capital, and transnational capital, as well as the contending social and political forces that lie behind state interests in the privatisation of healthcare, the growing prominence of transnational activities in healthcare, and the regional integration of capital in the healthcare provider industry. Civil society organizations provide a small but important countervailing force in the contention over the future of healthcare in the country. It is envisaged that the healthcare financing system will move towards a social insurance model, in which the state has an important regulating role. The important question, therefore, is whether the Malaysian government, with its vested interests, will have the capacity and the will to play this role in a social insurance system. The issues of ownership and control have important implications for governance more generally in a future healthcare system.
马来西亚是一个中高收入发展中国家,该国医疗保健私有化和公司化的近期历史突显了国家在企业医疗保健兴起过程中的同谋角色。自该国在20世纪80年代推行私有化政策以来,私人资本大举进入医疗保健服务提供商领域。本文探讨了医疗保健服务提供中的各种所有权利益:国家资本、食利资本和跨国资本,以及国家在医疗保健私有化方面的利益背后存在的相互竞争的社会和政治力量、医疗保健领域跨国活动日益突出的情况,以及医疗保健服务提供商行业资本的区域整合。民间社会组织在该国医疗保健未来的争论中提供了一股虽小但重要的制衡力量。预计医疗保健融资体系将朝着社会保险模式发展,国家在其中发挥重要的监管作用。因此,重要的问题是,拥有既得利益的马来西亚政府是否有能力和意愿在社会保险体系中发挥这一作用。所有权和控制权问题对未来医疗保健体系中更广泛的治理具有重要影响。