• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者在纵向研究中的流失:马来西亚队列研究的经验。

Participants Attrition in a Longitudinal Study: The Malaysian Cohort Study Experience.

机构信息

UKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute (UMBI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147216.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18147216
PMID:34299667
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8305012/
Abstract

The attrition rate of longitudinal study participation remains a challenge. To date, the Malaysian Cohort (TMC) study follow-up rate was only 42.7%. This study objective is to identify the cause of attrition among TMC participants and the measures to curb it. A total of 19,343 TMC participants from Kuala Lumpur and Selangor that was due for follow-up were studied. The two most common attrition reasons are undergoing medical treatment at another government or private health center (7.0%) and loss of interest in participating in the TMC project (5.1%). Those who were inclined to drop out were mostly Chinese, aged 50 years and above, unemployed, and had comorbidities during the baseline recruitment. We have also contacted 2183 participants for the home recruitment follow-up, and about 10.9% agreed to join. Home recruitment slightly improved the overall follow-up rate from 42.7% to 43.5% during the three-month study period.

摘要

纵向研究参与率的下降仍然是一个挑战。迄今为止,马来西亚队列研究(TMC)的随访率仅为 42.7%。本研究旨在确定 TMC 参与者流失的原因以及控制措施。共对来自吉隆坡和雪兰莪州的 19343 名 TMC 参与者进行了研究,这些参与者将进行随访。最常见的两个流失原因是在另一家政府或私人医疗机构接受治疗(7.0%)和对参与 TMC 项目失去兴趣(5.1%)。那些倾向于退出的人大多是中国人,年龄在 50 岁及以上,失业,在基线招募时患有合并症。我们还联系了 2183 名参与者进行家庭招募随访,其中约 10.9%同意参加。在为期三个月的研究期间,家庭招募使整体随访率从 42.7%略微提高到 43.5%。

相似文献

1
Participants Attrition in a Longitudinal Study: The Malaysian Cohort Study Experience.参与者在纵向研究中的流失:马来西亚队列研究的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147216.
2
Study retention and attrition in a longitudinal cohort study including patient-reported outcomes, fieldwork and biobank samples: results of the Netherlands quality of life and Biomedical cohort study (NET-QUBIC) among 739 head and neck cancer patients and 262 informal caregivers.在一项包括患者报告结局、实地工作和生物库样本的纵向队列研究中研究保留率和损耗率:739 例头颈部癌症患者和 262 例非正规照护者的荷兰生活质量和生物医学队列研究(NET-QUBIC)的结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01514-y.
3
Factors associated with participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of bacterial vaginosis in Australian women who have sex with women.在一项针对澳大利亚女性同性恋者细菌性阴道病的纵向研究中,与参与度和退出率相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 20;9(11):e113452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113452. eCollection 2014.
4
Exploring participant attrition in a longitudinal follow-up of older adults: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) Hamilton cohort.探讨老年人群纵向随访研究中的参与者流失情况:女性骨质疏松全球纵向研究(GLOW)汉密尔顿队列。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 25;13(7):e066594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066594.
5
Improving retention of very old participants in longitudinal research: experiences from the Newcastle 85+ study.提高老年参与者在纵向研究中的留存率:纽卡斯尔85岁及以上人群研究的经验
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e108370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108370. eCollection 2014.
6
Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: an epidemiological investigation.医学研究委员会认知功能与衰老研究中的失访和偏倚:一项流行病学调查。
BMC Public Health. 2004 Apr 27;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-12.
7
Factors Associated with Attrition in a Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults in the Community.社区老年纵向队列中与失访相关的因素。
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2023 Apr 27;10(2):178-189. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0380.
8
Informing retention in longitudinal cohort studies through a social marketing lens: Raine Study Generation 2 participants' perspectives on benefits and barriers to participation.通过社会营销视角告知纵向队列研究的保留率:雷恩研究二代参与者对参与的益处和障碍的看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01074-z.
9
Analysis of reasons for loss to follow up in a prospective study in Chandigarh, India and impact from telecom changes.分析印度昌迪加尔一项前瞻性研究中失访的原因及其与电信变更的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Nov 18;14(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05837-9.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Linking Creatinine-to-Body Weight Ratio With Diabetes Incidence: A Multiethnic Malaysian Cohort Study.肌酐与体重比和糖尿病发病率的关联:一项马来西亚多民族队列研究。
J Diabetes. 2025 Jan;17(1):e70039. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.70039.
2
The Road to Recovery: A Two-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Mental Health Among University Students During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.康复之路:对新冠疫情期间及之后大学生心理健康状况的两年纵向分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;14(12):1146. doi: 10.3390/bs14121146.
3
Development of digital health management systems in longitudinal study: The Malaysian cohort experience.纵向研究中数字健康管理系统的发展:马来西亚队列研究经验
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;10:20552076241277481. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277481. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Body fat distribution and bone mineral density in a multi-ethnic sample of postmenopausal women in The Malaysian Cohort.马来西亚队列研究中绝经后多民族女性的体脂分布与骨密度
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Aug 7;19(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01435-x.
5
Ethical challenges of conducting and reviewing human genomics research in Malaysia: An exploratory study.马来西亚开展和审查人类基因组学研究的伦理挑战:一项探索性研究。
Dev World Bioeth. 2024 Dec;24(4):331-341. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12435. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
6
Stability of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements from whole blood samples kept at -196°C for seven to eight years in The Malaysian Cohort study.马来西亚队列研究中,全血样本在-196°C 下保存 7 至 8 年时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量的稳定性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Apr;37(8):e24898. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24898. Epub 2023 May 26.
7
Auditing the research practices and statistical analyses of the group-level temporal network approach to psychological constructs: A systematic scoping review.对心理构念的群体层面时间网络方法的研究实践与统计分析进行审计:一项系统的范围综述。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):767-787. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01839-y. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Reasons for Declining Consent in a Population-Based Cohort Study Conducted in a Rural South American Community.在一个南美农村社区进行的基于人群队列研究中拒绝同意的原因。
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Nov 26;2018:8267948. doi: 10.1155/2018/8267948. eCollection 2018.
2
Predictors of Attrition in Longitudinal Neuroimaging Research: Inhibitory Control, Head Movement, and Resting-State Functional Connectivity.纵向神经影像学研究中失访的预测因素:抑制控制、头部运动和静息态功能连接。
Brain Connect. 2018 Nov;8(9):527-536. doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0619.
3
Factors affecting withdrawal and donation attrition in the brains for dementia research cohort.影响痴呆症研究队列中脑退出和捐赠流失的因素。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;33(12):1709-1716. doi: 10.1002/gps.4975. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Executive Functioning at Baseline Prospectively Predicts Depression Treatment Response.基线时的执行功能可前瞻性预测抑郁症治疗反应。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2017 Feb 9;19(1). doi: 10.4088/PCC.16m01949.
5
INFLEXIBLE COGNITION PREDICTS FIRST ONSET OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE EPISODES IN ADOLESCENCE.僵化认知预示青少年首次发生重度抑郁发作。
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Nov;33(11):1005-1012. doi: 10.1002/da.22513. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
6
The ROOTS study: a 10-year review of findings on adolescent depression, and recommendations for future longitudinal research.根源研究:对青少年抑郁症研究结果的十年回顾及对未来纵向研究的建议
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;51(2):161-70. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1150-y. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
7
How to Establish and Follow up a Large Prospective Cohort Study in the 21st Century--Lessons from UK COSMOS.如何在21世纪建立和随访大型前瞻性队列研究——来自英国COSMOS的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131521. eCollection 2015.
8
Cohort Profile: The Malaysian Cohort (TMC) project: a prospective study of non-communicable diseases in a multi-ethnic population.队列简介:马来西亚队列(TMC)项目:一项针对多民族人群非传染性疾病的前瞻性研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):423-31. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu089. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
9
Strategies to recruit and retain older adults in intervention studies: a quantitative comparative study.招募和保留干预研究中老年参与者的策略:一项定量比较研究。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
10
Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study.纵向研究中的损耗和可推广性:一项基于人群的 15 年研究和蒙特卡罗模拟研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 29;12:918. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-918.