• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[埃尔朗根考试。德国神经学专业学生选择题测试的一种替代方式]

[The Erlangen examination. An alternative to multiple choice testing for German neurology students].

作者信息

Heckmann J G, Rauch C, Dütsch M, Lang C, Weih M, Schwab S

机构信息

Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2008 Jun;79(6):676-83. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2438-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00115-008-2438-x
PMID:18330540
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the latest revision of the German Medical Licensing Regulation in 2002, educating faculties gained more freedom in the organisation and assessment of trainees. The Erlangen Neurological Exam Structured (ERNEST) is an alternative for assessing competency in clinical knowledge at the end of the neurological general education. The answers must be given in written, short essay format.

METHOD

The students (mostly 5th year of medical education) underwent the ERNEST including eight sections with ten to 15 questions each and the MC examination as had been applied earlier. The results were given in percentage scores. The examination was evaluated by a questionnaire using Likert scales.

RESULTS

A total of 128 students (81 women, 47 men) with a mean age of 25.3 years (range 22-33) completed their initial training by the exam. The mean score was 69.6% in the ERNEST and 73.4% in the MC part (P<0.001). Of the students 12.5% in ERNEST and 11.7% in the MC (nonsignificant) failed to reach the projected score of 60% to pass the exam. Correlation between the ERNEST and MC results was significant, with r=0.784 (Pearson's coefficient, P<0.001). The students evaluated the aspects innovation, length, format, clarity of the tasks, closeness to reality, and compatibility with general physician's practice as predominantly positive.

CONCLUSION

The ERNEST is a viable alternative form of assessment as compared to the conventional MC exam. The basic quantitative parameters of the assessment comply with the requirements of medical assessments. The students evaluated ERNEST as mainly positive.

摘要

背景

随着2002年德国医学许可条例的最新修订,教育机构在实习医生的组织和评估方面获得了更多自由。埃尔朗根神经学结构化考试(ERNEST)是在神经学通识教育结束时评估临床知识能力的一种替代方式。答案必须以书面短文形式给出。

方法

学生(大多为医学教育五年级)参加了ERNEST考试,包括八个部分,每个部分有10至15个问题,以及之前应用的MC考试。结果以百分比分数给出。通过使用李克特量表的问卷对考试进行评估。

结果

共有128名学生(81名女性,47名男性)平均年龄25.3岁(范围22 - 33岁)通过该考试完成了他们的初始培训。ERNEST考试的平均分数为69.6%,MC部分为73.4%(P<0.001)。在ERNEST考试中,12.5%的学生以及在MC考试中11.7%的学生(无显著差异)未达到预计的60%及格分数。ERNEST考试结果与MC考试结果之间的相关性显著,r = 0.784(皮尔逊系数,P<0.001)。学生们对创新性、长度、形式、任务清晰度、贴近现实程度以及与普通医生实践的兼容性等方面的评价大多为积极。

结论

与传统的MC考试相比,ERNEST是一种可行的评估替代形式。评估的基本定量参数符合医学评估的要求。学生们对ERNEST的评价主要为积极。

相似文献

1
[The Erlangen examination. An alternative to multiple choice testing for German neurology students].[埃尔朗根考试。德国神经学专业学生选择题测试的一种替代方式]
Nervenarzt. 2008 Jun;79(6):676-83. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2438-x.
2
[OSCE in the neurology clerkship. Experiences at the neurological department of the university hospital Erlangen].[神经病学实习中的客观结构化临床考试。埃尔朗根大学医院神经科的经验]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009 Jan;77(1):32-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100833. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
3
[Evaluation of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in surgery and orthopedics by medical students].
Unfallchirurg. 2010 Sep;113(9):726-30, 732-3. doi: 10.1007/s00113-009-1690-2.
4
[Nationwide evaluation of German university teaching methods in neurology].[德国大学神经病学教学方法的全国性评估]
Nervenarzt. 2015 Jun;86(6):736-42. doi: 10.1007/s00115-015-4304-y.
5
Effect of feedback from standardized patients on medical students' performance and perceptions of the neurological examination.标准化患者反馈对医学生神经检查表现和认知的影响。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):1005-10. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.588735.
6
An observational study of an approach to accommodate a fourth-year to third-year neurology clerkship curricular transition.一项关于适应第四年到第三年神经病学实习课程过渡方法的观察性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1710331. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1710331.
7
Do they know too little? An inter-institutional study on the anatomical knowledge of upper-year medical students based on multiple choice questions of a progress test.他们了解得太少了吗?一项基于进步测试多项选择题的机构间研究,关于高年级医学生的解剖学知识。
Ann Anat. 2017 Jan;209:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
8
Experience with the objective structured examination as a tool for students' assessment in the Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care in a university [corrected] in Western Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯西部一所[更正后]大学的社区医学与初级卫生保健系将客观结构化考试作为学生评估工具的经验。
Saudi Med J. 2002 Feb;23(2):151-5.
9
Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: a prospective cohort study.在线评估参数与药理学本科医学教育总结性考试成绩的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1814-5.
10
[Acquisition of clinical observation skills by medical students improves with discipline-based teaching. The example of neurological examination].[医学生通过基于学科的教学,临床观察技能的获得有所提高。以神经学检查为例]
Rev Med Interne. 2018 Dec;39(12):905-911. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of response format on achievement and aptitude assessment results: multi-level random effects meta-analyses.作答格式对成绩和能力倾向评估结果的影响:多层次随机效应荟萃分析
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 May 3;10(5):220456. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220456. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment in medical education.医学教育中的评估。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):387-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054784.
2
How assessment drives learning in neurosurgical higher training.评估如何推动神经外科高级培训中的学习。
J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Apr;14(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
3
[Practical examinations for neurology. The Tuebingen model].[神经病学实践考试。图宾根模式]
Nervenarzt. 2006 Dec;77(12):1464-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2199-3.
4
More thoughts on 'assessment drives learning'.
Med Educ. 2006 Nov;40(11):1149-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02638.x.
5
[The neurological examination--a lasting art].[神经学检查——一门永恒的艺术]
Ther Umsch. 2006 Jul;63(7):491-500. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.63.7.491.
6
[Evaluation of the medical curriculum: who should be asked and when about the clinical relevance?].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Feb 24;131(8):371-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932526.
7
[Experience with new teaching methods and testing in psychiatric training].
Nervenarzt. 2007 Mar;78(3):283-4, 287-90, 292-3. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-2048-9.
8
[Implementation of a competency-based graduate medical education program in a neurology department].[在神经科实施基于胜任力的毕业后医学教育项目]
Nervenarzt. 2006 Apr;77(4):439-48. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-2026-2.
9
A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities.针对本科医学生的改良电子钥匙功能测试:验证的威胁与机遇
Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):450-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590500078471.
10
[Effective didactic skills training for teachers in continuing medical education].[继续医学教育中教师有效的教学技能培训]
Rofo. 2005 Sep;177(9):1290-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858372.