Heckmann J G, Rauch C, Dütsch M, Lang C, Weih M, Schwab S
Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, Germany.
Nervenarzt. 2008 Jun;79(6):676-83. doi: 10.1007/s00115-008-2438-x.
With the latest revision of the German Medical Licensing Regulation in 2002, educating faculties gained more freedom in the organisation and assessment of trainees. The Erlangen Neurological Exam Structured (ERNEST) is an alternative for assessing competency in clinical knowledge at the end of the neurological general education. The answers must be given in written, short essay format.
The students (mostly 5th year of medical education) underwent the ERNEST including eight sections with ten to 15 questions each and the MC examination as had been applied earlier. The results were given in percentage scores. The examination was evaluated by a questionnaire using Likert scales.
A total of 128 students (81 women, 47 men) with a mean age of 25.3 years (range 22-33) completed their initial training by the exam. The mean score was 69.6% in the ERNEST and 73.4% in the MC part (P<0.001). Of the students 12.5% in ERNEST and 11.7% in the MC (nonsignificant) failed to reach the projected score of 60% to pass the exam. Correlation between the ERNEST and MC results was significant, with r=0.784 (Pearson's coefficient, P<0.001). The students evaluated the aspects innovation, length, format, clarity of the tasks, closeness to reality, and compatibility with general physician's practice as predominantly positive.
The ERNEST is a viable alternative form of assessment as compared to the conventional MC exam. The basic quantitative parameters of the assessment comply with the requirements of medical assessments. The students evaluated ERNEST as mainly positive.
随着2002年德国医学许可条例的最新修订,教育机构在实习医生的组织和评估方面获得了更多自由。埃尔朗根神经学结构化考试(ERNEST)是在神经学通识教育结束时评估临床知识能力的一种替代方式。答案必须以书面短文形式给出。
学生(大多为医学教育五年级)参加了ERNEST考试,包括八个部分,每个部分有10至15个问题,以及之前应用的MC考试。结果以百分比分数给出。通过使用李克特量表的问卷对考试进行评估。
共有128名学生(81名女性,47名男性)平均年龄25.3岁(范围22 - 33岁)通过该考试完成了他们的初始培训。ERNEST考试的平均分数为69.6%,MC部分为73.4%(P<0.001)。在ERNEST考试中,12.5%的学生以及在MC考试中11.7%的学生(无显著差异)未达到预计的60%及格分数。ERNEST考试结果与MC考试结果之间的相关性显著,r = 0.784(皮尔逊系数,P<0.001)。学生们对创新性、长度、形式、任务清晰度、贴近现实程度以及与普通医生实践的兼容性等方面的评价大多为积极。
与传统的MC考试相比,ERNEST是一种可行的评估替代形式。评估的基本定量参数符合医学评估的要求。学生们对ERNEST的评价主要为积极。