Heckmann J G, Knossalla F, Gollwitzer S, Lang C, Schwab S
Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009 Jan;77(1):32-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100833. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
In the German medical education program practical examinations at the end of the neurology clerkship are sparsely performed. By this way, motivation for practical learning and a method to assure quality of learning are not used.
The Anglo-Saxon concept of "objective structured clinical examination" (OSCE) is picked up and implemented as a practical examination at the end of the neurology clerkship of medical students in their 4th and 5th year. A catalogue of learning goals was defined and an OSCE of 5 stations was developed. A standard of a successful examination was defined. In two OSCE stations the competence in clinical decision making and reasoning were tested, in two stations the competence in practical examination skills and in one station the practical skill to perform a lumbar puncture at the phantom. The results of the OSCE stations were analysed for task difficulty, discriminatory power, normalized discrimination index and reliability. Using a questionnaire, the students evaluated the OSCE.
N = 123 students (73 female, 50 male) with a mean age of 26.1 years (22 - 46 years) participated. The mean score was 40 +/- 3.6 of a total of 50 points (range 29 - 46). Female students (40.8 +/- 3.1) scored significantly higher than male ones (38.8 +/- 4; p = .002). One student (0.8 %) failed the examination. The difficulty of the stations ranged between 0.63 and 0.91, normalized discrimination index between 0.1 and 0.18 and the discriminatory power from r = 0.25 to r = 0.53. The reliability of the 5 stations was 0.65 (Cronbach's alpha). In the evaluation, the rating for innovation, organisation, length, clarity of the tasks, clinical reality and compatibility with general physician's competence, atmosphere during the examination and fairness was extremely positive. Most students would prefer an OSCE compared with a multiple-choice test.
An OSCE at the end of the neurology clerkship is feasible. The quantitative analyses of the results are concordant with requirements of medical examinations. The OSCE is positively evaluated by the students.
在德国医学教育项目中,神经病学实习期末的实践考试开展较少。这样一来,实践学习的动力以及保证学习质量的方法都未得到运用。
借鉴盎格鲁 - 撒克逊的“客观结构化临床考试”(OSCE)概念,并将其作为四年级和五年级医学生神经病学实习期末的实践考试来实施。定义了学习目标目录,并开发了一个包含5个站点的OSCE。确定了成功考试的标准。在两个OSCE站点测试临床决策和推理能力,在两个站点测试实践考试技能,在一个站点测试在模拟人身上进行腰椎穿刺的实践技能。分析了OSCE各站点的任务难度、区分度、标准化区分指数和信度。通过问卷调查,让学生对OSCE进行评估。
共有123名学生(73名女生,50名男生)参与,平均年龄26.1岁(22 - 46岁)。平均成绩为50分制中的40 +/- 3.6分(范围29 - 46分)。女生(40.8 +/- 3.1分)得分显著高于男生(38.8 +/- 4分;p = .002)。一名学生(0.8%)考试不及格。各站点难度在0.63至0.91之间,标准化区分指数在0.1至0.18之间,区分度r值在0.25至0.53之间。5个站点的信度为0.65(克朗巴哈系数)。在评估中,对创新性、组织性、时长、任务清晰度、临床真实性以及与全科医生能力的兼容性、考试氛围和公平性的评分非常积极。与多项选择题测试相比,大多数学生更喜欢OSCE。
神经病学实习期末的OSCE是可行的。结果的定量分析符合医学考试要求。学生对OSCE给予了积极评价。