Migliorini C E, Elfström M L, Tonge B J
Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Spinal Cord. 2008 Oct;46(10):690-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.22. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
Representative community cross-sectional self-report survey of adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).
To establish semantic translation and validation of the Swedish scales--the Spinal Cord Lesion Coping Strategies Questionnaire and the Spinal Cord Lesion Emotional Wellbeing Questionnaire.
Adults on the Victorian traumatic SCI register and attendees of the nontraumatic outpatient clinic were invited to participate.
Instruments were forward and backward translated to establish semantic equivalence. Principle components analyses were undertaken. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were conducted to demonstrate validity of the instruments using both positive (high quality of life) and negative (depression and anxiety) psychological outcomes.
The final sample consisted of 443 adults with SCI living in the community. Both instruments demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Univariate correlation analyses showed most of the new scale components displayed medium to large relationships in the expected direction with the psychological outcomes and the other subscales. Health status and helplessness were significant predictors of both the positive and negative psychological outcomes in the logistic regression analyses. Acceptance was significantly related to the positive outcome only. Female and incomplete tetraplegia categories were significantly and positively related to depression only.
Notwithstanding a few issues with some of the subscales, the results support the usefulness of these easy to use instruments and point to ways for further development of the scales.
对脊髓损伤(SCI)成人进行具有代表性的社区横断面自我报告调查。
对瑞典量表——脊髓损伤应对策略问卷和脊髓损伤情绪健康问卷进行语义翻译和验证。
邀请了维多利亚州创伤性脊髓损伤登记册上的成年人以及非创伤性门诊的就诊者参与。
对工具进行正向和反向翻译以建立语义等效性。进行主成分分析。使用积极(高质量生活)和消极(抑郁和焦虑)心理结果进行相关分析和逻辑回归分析,以证明工具的有效性。
最终样本包括443名居住在社区的脊髓损伤成年人。两种工具均显示出可接受的心理测量特性。单变量相关分析表明,大多数新量表成分与心理结果和其他子量表在预期方向上呈现中等至较大的相关性。在逻辑回归分析中,健康状况和无助感是积极和消极心理结果的重要预测因素。接受度仅与积极结果显著相关。女性和不完全性四肢瘫类别仅与抑郁显著正相关。
尽管一些子量表存在一些问题,但结果支持这些易于使用的工具的有用性,并指出了量表进一步发展的方向。