Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina, USA.
Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Nov;54(4):440-8. doi: 10.1037/a0017402.
To directly compare estimates of potential depressive disorders and clinically significant depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Older Adult Health and Mood Questionnaire (OAHMQ) among participants with spinal cord injury (SCI).
727 participants from a hospital in the Southeastern United States were administered the PHQ-9 and OAHMQ during a follow-up survey. We compared the rates of depressive disorders using cutoff scores and diagnostic criteria for each instrument. No independent psychiatric diagnostic interviews were conducted.
The PHQ-9 and OAHMQ were significantly correlated (r = .78), and both were correlated with satisfaction with life (r = -.48, -.54). Using recommended diagnostic scoring procedures, 10.7% of participants met the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder with the PHQ-9; 9.3% met the criteria for major depression based on PHQ-9 > or = 10; and 19.7% based on PHQ-9 > or = 15. Using the OAHMQ, 19.7% reported probable major depression and 44.5% clinically significant symptomatology.
The measures were highly correlated overall. However, the estimated prevalence of depressive disorders varied substantially between the 2 instruments. These estimates were comparable to those previously reported for each instrument (i.e., higher rates with the OAHMQ). Therefore, differing estimates of depressive disorders reported in the literature using these instruments were largely attributable to the instruments themselves.
通过对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和老年健康与情绪问卷(OAHMQ),直接比较两种工具对潜在抑郁障碍和临床显著抑郁症状的评估结果。
美国东南部一家医院的 727 名参与者在随访调查中接受了 PHQ-9 和 OAHMQ 的测试。我们使用每种工具的截止分数和诊断标准比较了抑郁障碍的发生率。未进行独立的精神科诊断访谈。
PHQ-9 和 OAHMQ 呈显著相关(r =.78),且均与生活满意度呈负相关(r = -.48,-.54)。使用推荐的诊断评分程序,10.7%的参与者符合 PHQ-9 诊断标准的重度抑郁障碍;9.3%符合 PHQ-9 > 10 的标准;19.7%符合 PHQ-9 > 15 的标准。根据 OAHMQ,19.7%报告可能患有重度抑郁,44.5%有临床显著症状。
两种工具总体上相关性很高。然而,两种工具之间抑郁障碍的估计患病率差异很大。这些估计与之前每种工具的报告结果相当(即 OAHMQ 的报告率更高)。因此,文献中使用这些工具报告的抑郁障碍的不同估计主要归因于工具本身。