López-Vázquez E, Juan J A, Vila E, Debón J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de Sagunto, Valencia, Spain.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Oct;73(9):1294-300.
We repaired the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a Dacron prosthesis in fifty-four patients. Nineteen patients had an acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament, and thirty-five had a chronic rupture. In each patient, only one knee was involved. In twenty-six patients, the prosthesis was implanted arthroscopically, and in twenty-eight, the operation was done by arthrotomy. The length of follow-up ranged from two to five years. In thirty-one patients, a second arthroscopy of the knee was done at follow-up, and the findings were recorded. Only twenty-three patients were free of symptoms at the latest follow-up. Stability and the scores on the grading system of Lysholm and Gillquist were excellent in the first postoperative year; the results worsened due to complications occurring in the second year of follow-up. There were no differences in the results between patients who had a closed procedure and those who had an open procedure. No differences were noted between the patients who had an acute injury and those who had a chronic rupture. Twenty-six failures were directly related to the prosthesis, including rupture of the femoral insertion (thirteen) or tibial insertion (three), rupture of the central body (seven), and elongation in continuity (three). We concluded that a free Dacron prosthesis that is used to replace or supplement a torn anterior cruciate ligament is not a durable substitute for that ligament.
我们使用涤纶假体为54例患者修复了膝关节前交叉韧带。19例患者为前交叉韧带急性损伤,35例为慢性断裂。每位患者仅累及一侧膝关节。26例患者通过关节镜植入假体,28例通过切开手术进行操作。随访时间为2至5年。31例患者在随访时进行了第二次膝关节镜检查,并记录了检查结果。在最近一次随访时,只有23例患者无症状。术后第一年,稳定性以及Lysholm和Gillquist评分系统的评分均极佳;但在随访的第二年,由于出现并发症,结果恶化。闭合手术患者与开放手术患者的结果无差异。急性损伤患者与慢性断裂患者之间也未发现差异。26例失败直接与假体相关,包括股骨附着点断裂(13例)或胫骨附着点断裂(3例)、假体中央体断裂(7例)以及连续性伸长(3例)。我们得出结论,用于替代或补充撕裂的前交叉韧带的游离涤纶假体并非该韧带的持久替代品。