Heye Tobias, Kuntz Christian, Düx Markus, Encke Jens, Palmowski Moritz, Autschbach Frank, Volke Frank, Kauffmann Guenter Werner, Grenacher Lars
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2009 May;70(2):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.037. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
To prospectively compare diagnostic parameters of a newly developed endoluminal MRI (endo-MRI) concept with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and hydro-computer tomography (Hydro-CT) in T-staging of gastric carcinoma on one patient collective.
28 consecutive patients (11 females, 17 males, age range 46-87 years, median 67 years) referred for surgery due to a gastric malignancy were included. Preoperative staging by EUS was performed in 14 cases and by Hydro-CT in 14 cases within a time frame of 2 weeks. Ex vivo endo-MRI examination of gastric specimens was performed directly after gastrectomy within a time interval of 2-3h. EUS data were acquired from the clinical setting whereas Hydro-CT and endo-MRI data were evaluated in blinded fashion by two experienced radiologists and one surgeon well experienced in EUS on gastric carcinomas.
Histopathology resulted in 4 pT1, 17 pT2, 3 pT3 and 2 pT4 carcinomas with 2 gastric lymphomas which were excluded. Overall accuracy for endo-MRI was 75% for T-Staging of the 26 carcinomas. EUS achieved 42.9% accuracy; endo-MRI in this subgroup was accurate in 71.4%. Hydro-CT was correct in 28.6%, accuracy for endo-MRI in this subgroup was 71.4%.
The direct comparison of all three modalities on one patient collective shows that endo-MRI is able to achieve adequate staging results in comparison with clinically accepted methods like EUS and Hydro-CT in classifying the extent of tumor invasion into the gastric wall. However the comparison is limited as we compared in vivo routine clinical data with experimental ex vivo data. Future investigations need to show if the potential of endo-MRI can be transferred into a clinical in vivo setting.
前瞻性比较一种新开发的腔内磁共振成像(endo-MRI)概念与内镜超声(EUS)及水计算机断层扫描(Hydro-CT)在一组胃癌患者T分期中的诊断参数。
纳入28例因胃恶性肿瘤转诊接受手术的连续患者(11例女性,17例男性,年龄范围46 - 87岁,中位年龄67岁)。14例患者在2周内接受了EUS术前分期,14例患者接受了Hydro-CT术前分期。胃切除术后2 - 3小时内直接对胃标本进行离体endo-MRI检查。EUS数据来自临床环境,而Hydro-CT和endo-MRI数据由两名经验丰富的放射科医生和一名在胃癌EUS方面经验丰富的外科医生以盲法进行评估。
组织病理学检查发现4例pT1、17例pT2、3例pT3和2例pT4期癌,另有2例胃淋巴瘤被排除。26例癌的endo-MRI T分期总体准确率为75%。EUS的准确率为42.9%;该亚组中endo-MRI的准确率为71.4%。Hydro-CT的准确率为28.6%,该亚组中endo-MRI的准确率为71.4%。
在同一组患者中对这三种方法进行直接比较表明,与EUS和Hydro-CT等临床公认方法相比,endo-MRI在对肿瘤侵犯胃壁程度进行分类时能够获得足够的分期结果。然而,由于我们将体内常规临床数据与实验性离体数据进行了比较,所以该比较存在局限性。未来的研究需要表明endo-MRI的潜力能否转化为临床体内应用。