Huang Z, Xie D H, Guo L, Hu C H, Fang X, Meng Q, Ping X X, Lu Z W
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Br J Radiol. 2015 Jun;88(1050):20140552. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140552. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
To perform a meta-analysis and literature review regarding the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for pre-operative tumour depth invasion (T) and regional lymph node invasion (N) staging of gastric carcinoma (GC).
Articles were identified through systematic search of Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Springerlink and several Chinese databases. The study quality was assessed by the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy. 2 reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data from 11 eligible studies. A meta-analysis was then carried out. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed.
11 studies (439 patients) were finally included in the current review. Among these studies, the significant evidence of heterogeneity was only discovered for specificity in T4 stage (I(2) = 59.8%). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI to diagnose T stage tumour (T3-4 vs T1-2) were 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-0.96] and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95), respectively. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of MRI to diagnose N stage tumour (N0 vs N+) were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that diffusion-weighted imaging was more helpful for T staging.
The present systematic review suggests that MRI has a good diagnostic accuracy for pre-operative T staging of GC and should be widely used in clinical work. However, the ability for N staging is relatively poor on MRI.
In the pre-operative staging of GC, MRI was a useful tool and may enhance accuracy for the T staging of advanced GC.
对磁共振成像(MRI)在胃癌(GC)术前肿瘤深度浸润(T)和区域淋巴结浸润(N)分期诊断准确性方面进行荟萃分析和文献综述。
通过系统检索Medline、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、Springerlink以及几个中文数据库来确定文章。采用诊断准确性研究的质量评估方法对研究质量进行评估。两名审阅者独立从11项符合条件的研究中提取和评估数据。然后进行荟萃分析。还进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。
本综述最终纳入11项研究(439例患者)。在这些研究中,仅在T4期特异性方面发现了显著的异质性证据(I(2)=59.8%)。MRI诊断T期肿瘤(T3 - 4与T1 - 2)的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.93[95%置信区间(CI),0.89 - 0.96]和0.91(95%CI,0.87 - 0.95)。MRI诊断N期肿瘤(N0与N +)的敏感性和特异性合并估计值分别为0.86(95%CI,0.80 - 0.92)和0.67(95%CI,0.54 - 0.79)。亚组分析表明,扩散加权成像对T分期更有帮助。
本系统综述表明,MRI对GC术前T分期具有良好的诊断准确性,应在临床工作中广泛应用。然而,MRI对N分期的能力相对较差。
在GC术前分期中,MRI是一种有用的工具,可能提高晚期GC的T分期准确性。