• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear difference among midwife, private obstetrician, and resident deliveries.

作者信息

Sze Eddie H M, Ciarleglio Maria, Hobbs Gerry

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1141-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0600-4. Epub 2008 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-008-0600-4
PMID:18338093
Abstract

To identify risk factors that account for the difference in anal sphincter tear (AST) among midwife, private obstetrician, and resident deliveries. We performed a retrospective review of our obstetrical database and used logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for AST. The relationship between delivery technique and AST was evaluated by comparing AST increase between vaginal deliveries without and with an episiotomy among the three categories of providers. After adjusting for risk factors, private obstetricians (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.27-2.56) and residents (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.20-2.15) had a higher rate of AST during vaginal delivery than midwives. Episiotomy increased the odds of AST by four-fold for midwives, two-fold for private obstetricians, and eight-fold for residents. Although midwife and resident's delivery methods were associated with more AST, neither experienced this complication more frequently than private obstetricians. This suggests that midwives and residents probably misdiagnosed some AST.

摘要

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear difference among midwife, private obstetrician, and resident deliveries.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1141-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0600-4. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
2
Evaluation of Suzor forceps training by studying obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a retrospective study.通过研究产科肛门括约肌损伤评估苏佐尔产钳训练:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03358-0.
3
Does midwife experience affect the rate of severe perineal tears?助产士的经验会影响严重会阴撕裂的发生率吗?
Birth. 2017 Jun;44(2):161-166. doi: 10.1111/birt.12278. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries: Does Obstetrical Care Provider Matter? A Quality Assurance Study in Ontario.产科肛门括约肌损伤:产科护理提供者有影响吗?安大略省的一项质量保证研究。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):90-94. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000359.
5
Variation in Episiotomy Use Among Nulliparous Individuals by Maternity Care Provider and Associated Rates of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.初产妇会阴切开术使用情况在不同产科护理提供者之间的差异及相关产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 May;46(5):102415. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102415. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
6
Operator experience affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum extraction deliveries.操作人员的经验会影响真空吸引分娩中产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jun;98(6):787-794. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13538. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: A retrospective nationwide study.产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险和保护因素:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Birth. 2018 Dec;45(4):409-415. doi: 10.1111/birt.12346. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy.会阴切开术使用变化的方法及后果
BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1255-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1255.
9
Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.会阴切开术在阴道分娩中的应用及其与肛门括约肌损伤的关系:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2019 Oct 21;191(42):E1149-E1158. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190366.
10
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.印度南部一家三级医疗中心产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3398-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Decreased rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration is associated with change in obstetric practice.产科肛门括约肌裂伤发生率的降低与产科实践的改变有关。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Dec;18(12):1399-404. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0353-5. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
2
Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primiparous women.40923名初产妇中与肛门括约肌撕裂相关的因素。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Sep;18(9):985-90. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0274-8. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
3
Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery.
阴道分娩时肛门括约肌撕裂的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242616.56617.ff.
4
Anal incontinence among women with one versus two complete third-degree perineal lacerations.一度与二度完全性会阴Ⅲ度裂伤女性的肛门失禁情况。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Sep;90(3):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.04.017.
5
Prevalence and severity of anal incontinence in women with and without additional vaginal deliveries after a fourth-degree perineal laceration.四度会阴裂伤后有或无额外阴道分娩的女性肛门失禁的患病率和严重程度
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jan;48(1):66-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0781-y.
6
Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear: a comparison of primiparous patients, vaginal births after cesarean deliveries, and patients with previous vaginal delivery.与肛门括约肌撕裂相关的危险因素:初产妇、剖宫产术后经阴道分娩的患者及既往经阴道分娩患者的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;187(5):1194-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.126977.
7
Third and fourth degree perineal tears. Predictor factors in a referral hospital.三度和四度会阴撕裂。转诊医院中的预测因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Mar;80(3):229-34.
8
Predictors of episiotomy use at first spontaneous vaginal delivery.首次自然阴道分娩时会阴切开术使用的预测因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00868-1.
9
Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience.阴道分娩时的严重会阴裂伤:迈阿密大学的经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1083-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105403.
10
Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland--result of difference in manual help to the baby's head.瑞典和芬兰分娩时肛门括约肌破裂的发生率——对胎儿头部进行人工辅助方式不同的结果
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Nov;77(10):974-7.