Miyashita Naoyuki, Ouchi Kazunobu, Kawasaki Kozo, Komura Hayashi, Kawai Yasuhiro, Obase Yasushi, Kobashi Yoshihiro, Oka Mikio
Division of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Respirology. 2008 Mar;13(2):299-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01196.x.
The study evaluated a newly developed ELISA (Hitazyme Chlamydophila pneumoniae) for detecting anti-C. pneumoniae-specific IgM antibody, by comparing the ELISA assay to a microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test and immunoblotting.
One hundred patients with acute respiratory tract infections (58 children and 42 adults) were enrolled in the study. Paired sera were obtained from all subjects for serological testing of C. pneumoniae.
C. pneumoniae IgM positivity was observed in 36 (62.0%) children and 11 (26.1%) adults. However, MIF test or immunoblot revealed only four positive reactions in these patients. These four IgM-positive patients were also positive by ELISA. A significant increase in IgG and/or IgA antibody titres in paired sera was observed in three of the four patients. Of the remaining 96 patients, no significant increase in IgG or IgA antibody titre in the paired sera was observed. To confirm the positive reactivity of ELISA, positive sera were also analysed by recombinant enzyme immunoassay. Forty-three cases that were IgM-positive only by ELISA were all negative by recombinant enzyme immunoassay and the ELISA results were considered to be false-positives.
These results indicate that a newly developed ELISA for detecting anti-C. pneumoniae-specific IgM antibody frequently generates false-positive findings in patients with acute respiratory tract infections, at the current cut-off level. Further studies are needed to determine an appropriate cut-off level and the possible causes of the false-positive results in the ELISA.
本研究通过将酶联免疫吸附测定(Hitazyme嗜肺衣原体检测法)与微量免疫荧光法(MIF)及免疫印迹法进行比较,对一种新开发的用于检测抗肺炎衣原体特异性IgM抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定进行了评估。
100例急性呼吸道感染患者(58例儿童和42例成人)纳入本研究。采集所有受试者的配对血清用于肺炎衣原体的血清学检测。
在36例(62.0%)儿童和11例(26.1%)成人中观察到肺炎衣原体IgM阳性。然而,MIF试验或免疫印迹在这些患者中仅显示4例阳性反应。这4例IgM阳性患者通过酶联免疫吸附测定也呈阳性。4例患者中有3例在配对血清中观察到IgG和/或IgA抗体滴度显著升高。其余96例患者中,配对血清中未观察到IgG或IgA抗体滴度显著升高。为确认酶联免疫吸附测定的阳性反应性,还通过重组酶免疫测定对阳性血清进行了分析。43例仅通过酶联免疫吸附测定IgM呈阳性的病例通过重组酶免疫测定均为阴性,酶联免疫吸附测定结果被认为是假阳性。
这些结果表明,在目前的临界值水平下,一种新开发的用于检测抗肺炎衣原体特异性IgM抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定在急性呼吸道感染患者中经常产生假阳性结果。需要进一步研究以确定合适的临界值水平以及酶联免疫吸附测定中假阳性结果的可能原因。