Frikha-Gargouri O, Znazen A, Gdoura R, Gargouri B, Arab N Ben, Jemaa M Ben, Hammami A
Department of Microbiology and Research Laboratory microorganismes et pathologie humaine, Habib-Bourguiba Hospital, University School of Medecine, avenue Magida-Boulila, Sfax, Tunisia.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2008 May;56(3):143-7. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2007.09.020. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (Cpn) are obligate intracellular bacteria causing genital tract infections (GTI) and respiratory tract infections (RTI), respectively. Antigenic cross-reactivity between the two species may complicate serologic diagnosis. In this study, we compared the performance of two ELISA tests in relation to microimmunofluorescence (MIF) for the detection of Ct and Cpn IgG antibodies. We also explored the degree of cross-reactivity by ELISA and MIF. Among 278 positive sera for Cpn and/or Ct IgG antibodies in the MIF, 153 were from patients with GTI and 125 were from patients with RTI. These sera were tested by our in house MIF test and by two commercial ELISA: SeroCP and SeroCT for the detection of anti-Cpn IgG antibodies and anti-Ct IgG antibodies, respectively. In sera from patients with RTI, correlation between MIF and SeroCP was 92%. The specificity of this test was 38.5%. In fact, among the 140 sera from patients with GTI and that cross-reacted in MIF, only six were confirmed by the two ELISA tests as having IgG antibodies to Ct. The correlation between MIF and SeroCT was 80%. The specificity of this test was 100%. Indeed, among the 65 sera from patients with RTI with cross-reactions in MIF, 30 sera showed a negative SeroCT test. SeroCT was highly specific and could diminish considerably the extent of cross-reactions. Whilst, SeroCP test was not specific enough to distinguish between the presence of IgG antibodies and Cpn or Ct.
沙眼衣原体(Ct)和肺炎衣原体(Cpn)是专性细胞内细菌,分别引起生殖道感染(GTI)和呼吸道感染(RTI)。这两种菌之间的抗原交叉反应可能会使血清学诊断复杂化。在本研究中,我们比较了两种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测与微量免疫荧光法(MIF)检测Ct和Cpn IgG抗体的性能。我们还通过ELISA和MIF探究了交叉反应程度。在MIF检测中278份Cpn和/或Ct IgG抗体阳性血清中,153份来自GTI患者,125份来自RTI患者。这些血清通过我们内部的MIF检测以及两种商业ELISA检测:分别用于检测抗Cpn IgG抗体的SeroCP和用于检测抗Ct IgG抗体的SeroCT。在RTI患者的血清中,MIF与SeroCP之间的相关性为92%。该检测的特异性为38.5%。实际上,在140份来自GTI患者且在MIF检测中有交叉反应的血清中,只有6份被两种ELISA检测确认为具有抗Ct IgG抗体。MIF与SeroCT之间的相关性为80%。该检测的特异性为100%。确实,在65份来自RTI患者且在MIF检测中有交叉反应的血清中,30份血清的SeroCT检测呈阴性。SeroCT具有高度特异性,可显著减少交叉反应的程度。而SeroCP检测的特异性不足以区分IgG抗体是由Cpn还是Ct产生的。