Katz Bradley D, Luperchio Steven A, Thorne Grace M
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, MA 02421, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;61(3):315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
Two prediffusion methods with daptomycin (DAP) Neo-Sensitabs were evaluated against a challenge set of 30 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 30 enterococci. DAP Neo-Sensitabs were prediffused for either 8 or 20 h on Mueller-Hinton agar. Inhibition zones were plotted versus Etest MIC values determined on the same prediffused agar. A generalization to the genus level of the manufacturer's suggested Neo-Sensitabs breakpoints for staphylococci and enterococci was used to interpret the results. DAP-susceptible and DAP-nonsusceptible enterococci, Enterococcus faecium in particular, were not reliably discriminated using a 20-h prediffusion method and the manufacturer's suggested breakpoints. Further development of this testing methodology, such as changing the format to a susceptibility screen followed by a confirmatory MIC, is needed to accurately categorize the DAP susceptibility of enterococcal isolates. Prediffusion for either 8 or 20 h with DAP Neo-Sensitabs discriminated between susceptible and nonsusceptible S. aureus with minimal errors. Both prediffusion methods also detected changes in MIC values between isogenic pairs of susceptible and nonsusceptible S. aureus. These results suggest that a multisite evaluation of either prediffusion method with DAP Neo-Sensitabs against a larger collection of S. aureus is warranted.
采用达托霉素(DAP)新型药敏片的两种预扩散方法,对30株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株和30株肠球菌的挑战菌株进行了评估。DAP新型药敏片在穆勒-欣顿琼脂上预扩散8或20小时。根据在相同预扩散琼脂上测定的Etest MIC值绘制抑菌圈。采用制造商建议的针对葡萄球菌和肠球菌的新型药敏片断点向属水平的推广来解释结果。使用20小时预扩散方法和制造商建议的断点,无法可靠地区分对DAP敏感和不敏感的肠球菌,尤其是粪肠球菌。需要进一步开发这种检测方法,例如将形式改为敏感性筛查,随后进行确认性MIC检测,以准确分类肠球菌分离株的DAP敏感性。使用DAP新型药敏片预扩散8或20小时,能以最小误差区分敏感和不敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌。两种预扩散方法还检测到了敏感和不敏感金黄色葡萄球菌同基因对之间MIC值的变化。这些结果表明,有必要对使用DAP新型药敏片的两种预扩散方法针对更多金黄色葡萄球菌进行多中心评估。