Suppr超能文献

切叶蚁社会中的遗传“王室欺骗者”

Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies.

作者信息

Hughes William O H, Boomsma Jacobus J

机构信息

Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5150-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710262105. Epub 2008 Mar 13.

Abstract

Social groups are vulnerable to cheating because the reproductive interests of group members are rarely identical. All cooperative systems are therefore predicted to involve a mix of cooperative and cheating genotypes, with the frequency of the latter being constrained by the suppressive abilities of the former. The most significant potential conflict in social insect colonies is over which individuals become reproductive queens rather than sterile workers. This reproductive division of labor is a defining characteristic of eusocial societies, but individual larvae will maximize their fitness by becoming queens whereas their nestmates will generally maximize fitness by forcing larvae to become workers. However, evolutionary constraints are thought to prevent cheating by removing genetic variation in caste propensity. Here, we show that one-fifth of leaf-cutting ant patrilines cheat their nestmates by biasing their larval development toward becoming queens rather than workers. Two distinct mechanisms appear to be involved, one most probably involving a general tendency to become a larger adult and the other relating specifically to the queen-worker developmental switch. Just as evolutionary theory predicts, these "royal" genotypes are rare both in the population and within individual colonies. The rarity of royal cheats is best explained as an evolutionary strategy to avoid suppression by cooperative genotypes, the efficiency of which is frequency-dependent. The results demonstrate that cheating can be widespread in even the most cooperative of societies and illustrate that identical principles govern social evolution in highly diverse systems.

摘要

社会群体容易受到欺骗行为的影响,因为群体成员的繁殖利益很少是一致的。因此,所有合作系统预计都包含合作型和欺骗型基因型的混合,后者的频率受到前者抑制能力的限制。社会性昆虫群落中最显著的潜在冲突在于哪些个体成为有繁殖能力的蚁后而非不育的工蚁。这种繁殖分工是真社会性社会的一个决定性特征,但单个幼虫会通过成为蚁后来最大化自身适应性,而其巢伴通常会通过迫使幼虫成为工蚁来最大化适应性。然而,进化限制被认为通过消除等级倾向的遗传变异来防止欺骗行为。在此,我们表明,五分之一的切叶蚁父系通过使幼虫发育偏向成为蚁后而非工蚁来欺骗它们的巢伴。似乎涉及两种不同的机制,一种很可能涉及成为体型更大成虫的一般倾向,另一种则特别与蚁后 - 工蚁发育转换相关。正如进化理论所预测的那样,这些“王室”基因型在种群和单个蚁群中都很罕见。王室欺骗者的罕见最好解释为一种进化策略,以避免被合作型基因型抑制,其效率取决于频率。结果表明,即使在最具合作性的社会中,欺骗行为也可能广泛存在,并说明相同的原则支配着高度多样化系统中的社会进化。

相似文献

1
Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies.切叶蚁社会中的遗传“王室欺骗者”
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5150-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710262105. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
6
Genetic components to caste allocation in a multiple-queen ant species.在一个多蚁后蚁种中,等级分配的遗传成分。
Evolution. 2011 Oct;65(10):2907-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01348.x. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
Workers influence royal reproduction.工人影响王室生育。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 22;278(1711):1524-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1774. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
9
Size and asymmetry: are there costs to winning the royalty race?大小与非对称:赢得王室之争是否有代价?
J Evol Biol. 2012 Mar;25(3):522-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02444.x. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Account of the Breeding Systems of the Fire Ant .火蚁繁殖系统的全面阐述
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e71888. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71888. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Genotypes and phenotypes in a -ant symbiosis.-抗共生体中的基因型和表型。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 26;12:e17781. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17781. eCollection 2024.
4
Novel insights into paternity skew in a polyandrous social wasp.对多配性社会性黄蜂父权偏态的新见解。
Insect Sci. 2024 Dec;31(6):1876-1888. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13343. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
Equilibria and oscillations in cheat-cooperator dynamics.欺骗者 - 合作者动态中的平衡与振荡
Evol Lett. 2023 Jul 22;7(5):339-350. doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrad032. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
The evolution of manipulative cheating.手法作弊的演变。
Elife. 2022 Oct 4;11:e80611. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80611.
10
Relatedness and the evolution of mechanisms to divide labor in microorganisms.微生物中的亲缘关系与分工机制的进化
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 8;11(21):14475-14489. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8067. eCollection 2021 Nov.

本文引用的文献

2
Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.合作的进化解释。
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R661-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.004.
4
Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies.遗传多样性促进昆虫群体的稳态。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Aug;22(8):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
8
Enforced altruism in insect societies.昆虫社会中的强制利他行为。
Nature. 2006 Nov 2;444(7115):50. doi: 10.1038/444050a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验