Blonski Wojciech, Vela Marcelo, Safder Akber, Hila Amine, Castell Donald O
Division of Gastroenterology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;103(3):699-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01593.x.
Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) has been defined by the presence of > or = 30% liquid swallows with contraction amplitude < 30 mmHg (ineffective swallows) in the distal esophagus ("old" IEM). A recent study with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) raised the question whether the manometric diagnosis of IEM should be based on a new definition: > or = 50% ineffective liquid swallows ("new" IEM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the number of ineffective liquid swallows and symptoms and bolus transit in patients with "new" or "old" IEM who underwent MII-EM studies using 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows.
There were 150 patients with "old" IEM included in the study. The patients diagnosed with "old" IEM (N = 150) (group A) were compared with those who retained a manometric diagnosis of IEM by the new definition (N = 101) (group B). The patients who did not retain their manometric diagnosis of IEM by the new definition (N = 49) (group C) were compared with group B. IEM was characterized as mild (normal bolus transit for both liquid and viscous swallows), moderate (abnormal bolus transit either for liquid or viscous swallows), or severe (abnormal bolus transit for both liquid and viscous swallows).
There was no statistical difference in frequency of mild, moderate, or severe IEM and frequency of symptoms between group A and B. Group C had a significantly higher frequency of mild IEM and significantly lower frequency of severe IEM than group B. Heartburn (25.7%vs 10.2%, P= 0.03) and dysphagia (24.8%vs 12.3%, P= 0.08) showed a trend towards a greater frequency in group B than in group C.
Our study indicates that IEM with > or = 50% ineffective liquid swallows is frequently associated with bolus transit abnormalities and esophageal symptoms. Our results underscore the rationale for using the new definition of IEM.
无效食管动力(IEM)被定义为在食管远端出现≥30%的液体吞咽且收缩幅度<30 mmHg(无效吞咽)(“旧”IEM)。最近一项结合多通道腔内阻抗和测压(MII-EM)的研究提出了一个问题,即IEM的测压诊断是否应基于一个新定义:≥50%的无效液体吞咽(“新”IEM)。本研究的目的是评估在接受使用10次液体吞咽和10次粘性吞咽的MII-EM研究的“新”或“旧”IEM患者中,无效液体吞咽次数与症状及团块通过之间的关联。
本研究纳入了150例“旧”IEM患者。将诊断为“旧”IEM的患者(N = 150)(A组)与根据新定义仍保留IEM测压诊断的患者(N = 101)(B组)进行比较。将未根据新定义保留IEM测压诊断的患者(N = 49)(C组)与B组进行比较。IEM被分为轻度(液体和粘性吞咽的团块通过均正常)、中度(液体或粘性吞咽的团块通过异常)或重度(液体和粘性吞咽的团块通过均异常)。
A组和B组在轻度、中度或重度IEM的频率以及症状频率方面无统计学差异。C组轻度IEM的频率显著高于B组,重度IEM的频率显著低于B组。烧心(25.7%对10.2%,P = 0.03)和吞咽困难(24.8%对12.3%,P = 0.08)在B组中的频率有高于C组的趋势。
我们的研究表明,无效液体吞咽≥50%的IEM常与团块通过异常和食管症状相关。我们的结果强调了使用IEM新定义的合理性。