de Falco F A, Montariello A, Mastroroberto G, Visconti O S
U.L.S. N. 44, Ospedale S. Maria di Loreto Nuovo, Napoli.
Clin Ter. 1991 Jul 15;138(1):21-6.
The effects of picotamide (300 mg b.i.d.) for secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia were compared with the effects of low-dosage aspirin (300 mg/die). Out of the 87 randomized patients, 47 completed a six month period of treatment: 29 patients in the picotamide (group P) with a mean period of 14.5 months, 18 in the aspirin group (group A) with a mean period of 15.2 months. Both showed reduced incidence of further cerebral ischemic episodes in comparison with non treated patients (literature data). Using intention-to-treat analysis, the recurrence of ischemic events (including TIA) was 5.8% in group P and 14.3% in group A. Explanatory analysis yielded similar results: 10.3% of patients in group P and 27.8% in group A had recurrence of cerebral ischemic eposides. Evaluating as endpoints only RIND and stroke, the incidence was 10.3% in group P and 16.7% in group A. In conclusion, picotamide was more effective than aspirin; however the difference was not statistically significant due to the small number of patients. The drug was well tolerated and only two patients dropped out because of side effects. Picotamide did not alter laboratory tests significantly.
将匹可托胺(300毫克,每日两次)用于脑缺血二级预防的效果与小剂量阿司匹林(300毫克/日)的效果进行了比较。在87例随机分组的患者中,47例完成了为期6个月的治疗:匹可托胺组(P组)29例,平均治疗时间为14.5个月;阿司匹林组(A组)18例,平均治疗时间为15.2个月。与未治疗的患者相比(文献数据),两组患者进一步发生脑缺血事件的发生率均有所降低。采用意向性分析,P组缺血事件(包括短暂性脑缺血发作)的复发率为5.8%,A组为14.3%。解释性分析得出了类似的结果:P组10.3%的患者和A组27.8%的患者发生了脑缺血事件复发。仅将可逆性缺血性神经功能缺损(RIND)和中风作为终点进行评估,P组的发生率为10.3%,A组为16.7%。总之,匹可托胺比阿司匹林更有效;然而,由于患者数量较少,差异无统计学意义。该药物耐受性良好,仅有两名患者因副作用退出。匹可托胺对实验室检查结果无显著影响。