Ann Neurol. 1997 Dec;42(6):857-65. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420606.
Aspirin is only modestly effective in the secondary prevention after cerebral ischemia. Studies in other vascular disorders suggest that anticoagulant drugs in patients with cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial (noncardiac) origin might be more effective. The aim of the Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) therefore was to compare the efficacy and safety of 30 mg aspirin daily and oral anticoagulation (international normalized ratio [INR] 3.0-4.5). Patients referred to a neurologist in one of 58 collaborating centers because of a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke (Rankin grade < or =3) were eligible. Randomization was concealed, treatment assignment was open, and assessment of outcome events was masked. The primary measure of outcome was the composite event "death from all vascular causes, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal major bleeding complication." The trial was stopped at the first interim analysis. A total of 1,316 patients participated; their mean follow-up was 14 months. There was an excess of the primary outcome event in the anticoagulated group (81 of 651) versus 36 of 665 in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.5). This excess could be attributed to 53 major bleeding complications (27 intracranial; 17 fatal) during anticoagulant therapy versus 6 on aspirin (3 intracranial; 1 fatal). The bleeding incidence increased by a factor of 1.43 (95% CI, 0.96-2.13) for each 0.5 unit increase of the achieved INR. Anticoagulant therapy with an INR range of 3.0 to 4.5 in patients after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin is not safe. The efficacy of a lower intensity anticoagulation regimen remains to be determined.
阿司匹林在脑缺血后的二级预防中效果一般。其他血管疾病的研究表明,对于推测为动脉(非心脏)源性脑缺血患者,抗凝药物可能更有效。因此,可逆性缺血性卒中预防试验(SPIRIT)的目的是比较每日30毫克阿司匹林与口服抗凝治疗(国际标准化比值[INR] 3.0 - 4.5)的疗效和安全性。因短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度缺血性卒中(Rankin分级≤3级)而被转诊至58个协作中心之一的神经科医生处的患者符合入选条件。随机分组采用隐匿法,治疗分配公开,结局事件评估采用盲法。主要结局指标是复合事件“所有血管原因导致的死亡、非致命性卒中、非致命性心肌梗死或非致命性大出血并发症”。该试验在首次中期分析时停止。共有1316例患者参与;平均随访14个月。抗凝组(651例中有81例)的主要结局事件多于阿司匹林组(665例中有36例)(风险比,2.3;95%置信区间[CI],1.6 - 3.5)。这种差异可归因于抗凝治疗期间发生53例大出血并发症(27例颅内出血;17例致命),而阿司匹林组为6例(3例颅内出血;1例致命)。所达到的INR每增加0.5个单位,出血发生率增加1.43倍(95% CI,0.96 - 2.13)。对于推测为动脉源性脑缺血后的患者,INR范围为3.0至4.5的抗凝治疗不安全。较低强度抗凝方案的疗效仍有待确定。