Soma Tomoyuki, Hino Mitsunori, Kida Kozui, Kudoh Shoji
Pulmonary Center, Chiba-Hokuso Hospital, Nippon Medical School, Chiba.
Intern Med. 2008;47(6):493-501. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.0429. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
We hypothesized that non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) would improve an acute asthma attack in mild to moderate cases without bronchodilator therapy.
A total of 44 eligible patients with acute asthma of mild to moderate severity who had acute attacks were randomly allocated to a NPPV (n=30) or control group (n=14). Both groups received intravenous infusion of hydrocortisone prior to the study. Patients in the NPPV group were divided into two subgroups at random: a high- (n=16) and a low-pressure group (n=14). The former had a fixed expiratory positive airway pressure and inspiratory positive airway pressure of 6 cmH2O and 8 cmH2O, respectively, while the latter had levels of 4 cmH2O and 6 cmH2O, respectively. Effects on the following variables were assessed: FEV(1), oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate, scores of accessory muscle use and wheezing by auscultation, modified Borg scale score, and mean intra-airway pressure on the monitor.
A total of 26 patients completed the study in the NPPV group. The mean percent change in FEV(1) significantly improved after 40 minutes in the high-pressure group compared with that in the control group (p<0.0001). Similar significant improvements in modified Borg scale score and physical examination findings were observed in the high- and low-pressure groups. None of the patients required re-hospitalization or return to the emergency room in either the NPPV or control group.
We conclude that higher inflation pressure on NPPV led to clinical improvement in patients with acute asthma attacks of mild to moderate severity.
我们假设在不使用支气管扩张剂治疗的情况下,无创正压通气(NPPV)可改善轻至中度急性哮喘发作。
共有44例符合条件的轻至中度急性哮喘发作患者被随机分配至NPPV组(n = 30)或对照组(n = 14)。两组在研究前均接受静脉注射氢化可的松。NPPV组患者被随机分为两个亚组:高压组(n = 16)和低压组(n = 14)。前者呼气末气道正压和吸气末气道正压分别固定为6 cmH₂O和8 cmH₂O,而后者分别为4 cmH₂O和6 cmH₂O。评估对以下变量的影响:第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)、血氧饱和度、心率、呼吸频率、辅助肌使用评分及听诊哮鸣音、改良Borg量表评分以及监护仪上的平均气道内压。
NPPV组共有26例患者完成研究。与对照组相比,高压组FEV₁的平均变化百分比在40分钟后显著改善(p < 0.0001)。在高压组和低压组中均观察到改良Borg量表评分和体格检查结果有类似的显著改善。NPPV组和对照组均无患者需要再次住院或返回急诊室。
我们得出结论,NPPV较高的充气压力可使轻至中度急性哮喘发作患者的临床症状得到改善。