Suppr超能文献

颈内动脉与C1椎体前侧的关系:对C1-C2经关节突及C1侧块固定的意义

Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation.

作者信息

Currier Bradford L, Maus Tim P, Eck Jason C, Larson Dirk R, Yaszemski Michael J

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 15;33(6):635-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166e083.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomic study of the internal carotid artery (ICA) location with respect to C1 based on computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast medium.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the location of the ICA relative to the anterior aspect of C1 to assess the risk of placing C1-C2 transarticular or C1 lateral mass screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral artery injury is a known risk from placement of screws in C1. A previous case report revealed an ideally placed C1-C2 transarticular screw abutting and narrowing the ICA. The risk of ICA injury from C1 screws is unknown.

METHODS

Fifty random head and neck CT scans with contrast medium were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements were taken bilaterally including the closest distance from the ICA lumen to C1 and the distance from the medial edge of the ICA to a line drawn along the medial border of the foramen transversarium. The risk of inserting bicortical C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass screws was estimated based on these measurements.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the ICA to C1 was 2.88 mm on the left and 2.89 mm on the right. The ICA lumen was medial to the foramen transversarium in 42 (84%) of 50 cases (mean: 2.78 mm on the left and 3.00 mm on the right). The proximity of the ICA to C1 posed moderate risk in 46% of cases and high risk in 12% (on at least one side).

CONCLUSION

Because of the risk of ICA injury from a drill bit or the tip of a bicortical screw, we recommend preoperative CT scan with contrast medium in all cases in which a screw is to be placed into C1. If the ICA is in close proximity to the anterior border of C1, unicortical fixation or a different fusion technique should be considered.

摘要

研究设计

基于增强计算机断层扫描(CT)对颈内动脉(ICA)相对于C1的位置进行解剖学研究。

目的

测量ICA相对于C1前侧的位置,以评估置入C1-C2经关节螺钉或C1侧块螺钉的风险。

背景资料总结

椎动脉损伤是C1螺钉置入已知的风险。既往一份病例报告显示,一枚置入理想的C1-C2经关节螺钉紧邻颈内动脉并使其变窄。C1螺钉导致颈内动脉损伤的风险尚不清楚。

方法

回顾性分析50例随机选取的头颈部增强CT扫描。双侧进行测量,包括从ICA管腔到C1的最短距离,以及从ICA内侧缘到沿横突孔内侧缘所画直线的距离。基于这些测量结果估计置入C1-C2经关节双皮质螺钉和C1侧块螺钉的风险。

结果

ICA到C1的平均距离左侧为2.88mm,右侧为2.89mm。50例中有42例(84%)的ICA管腔位于横突孔内侧(左侧平均为2.78mm,右侧为3.00mm)。在46%的病例中,ICA与C1的接近程度构成中度风险,12%(至少一侧)构成高风险。

结论

由于钻头或双皮质螺钉尖端有导致ICA损伤的风险,我们建议在所有拟将螺钉置入C1的病例中术前行增强CT扫描。如果ICA紧邻C1前缘,应考虑采用单皮质固定或不同的融合技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验