Doehn Christian, Böhmer Torsten, Kausch Ingo, Sommerauer Martin, Jocham Dieter
Department of Urology, University of Lübeck Medical School, Lübeck, Germany.
BioDrugs. 2008;22(2):71-84. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200822020-00001.
Standard systemic treatment of prostate cancer today is comprised of antihormonal and cytostatic agents. Vaccine therapy of prostate cancer is principally attractive because of the presence of tumor-associated antigens such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and others. Most prostate cancer vaccine trials have demonstrated some activation of the immune system, limited clinical success, and few adverse effects.One strategy to overcome the problem of limited clinical success of vaccine therapies in prostate cancer could be strict patient selection. The clinical course of patients with prostate cancer (even in those with PSA relapse following surgery or radiotherapy with curative intention, or those with metastatic disease) can vary significantly. In patients with organ-confined prostate cancer, the most promising immunotherapeutic approach would be an adjuvant therapy following surgery or radiotherapy. Patients with PSA relapse following surgery or radiotherapy could also benefit from immunotherapy because tumor burden is usually low. However, most patients in prostate cancer vaccine trials had metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). High tumor burden correlates with immune escape phenomena. Nevertheless, 2 years ago, it was demonstrated, for the first time, that a tumor vaccine can prolong survival compared with placebo in patients with HRPC. This was demonstrated with the vaccine sipuleucel-T (APC-8015; Provenge), a mixture of cells obtained from the patient's peripheral blood by leukapheresis followed by density centrifugation and exposition. The Biologics License Application for this vaccine was denied by the US FDA in mid 2007, however, because the trial had failed to reach the primary endpoint (prolongation of time to tumor progression). Nevertheless, clinical trials with sipuleucel-T are ongoing, and the approach still looks promising. Another interesting approach is a vaccine made from whole tumor cells: GVAX. This vaccine is presently being studied in phase III trials against, and in combination with, docetaxel. The results from these trials will become available in the near future. Besides the precise definition of the disease status of patients with prostate cancer, combinations of vaccine therapy with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or hormonal therapy are approaches that look promising and deserve further investigation.
如今前列腺癌的标准全身治疗由抗激素药物和细胞毒性药物组成。前列腺癌疫苗疗法主要因其存在肿瘤相关抗原而具有吸引力,如前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)、前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)等。大多数前列腺癌疫苗试验都证明了免疫系统有一定激活,临床成功有限,且不良反应较少。克服前列腺癌疫苗疗法临床成功有限这一问题的一种策略可能是严格的患者选择。前列腺癌患者的临床病程(即使是那些术后或根治性放疗后PSA复发的患者,或有转移性疾病的患者)差异可能很大。对于器官局限性前列腺癌患者,最有前景的免疫治疗方法是术后或放疗后的辅助治疗。术后或放疗后PSA复发的患者也可能从免疫治疗中获益,因为肿瘤负荷通常较低。然而,大多数前列腺癌疫苗试验的患者患有转移性激素难治性前列腺癌(HRPC)。高肿瘤负荷与免疫逃逸现象相关。尽管如此,两年前首次证明,与安慰剂相比,肿瘤疫苗可延长HRPC患者的生存期。这是通过疫苗sipuleucel-T(APC-8015;Provenge)证明的,它是通过白细胞分离术从患者外周血中获取细胞,然后进行密度离心和处理得到的混合物。然而,该疫苗的生物制品许可申请在2007年年中被美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)驳回,因为试验未能达到主要终点(延长肿瘤进展时间)。尽管如此,sipuleucel-T的临床试验仍在进行,该方法看起来仍有前景。另一种有趣的方法是全肿瘤细胞制成的疫苗:GVAX。这种疫苗目前正在进行针对多西他赛以及与多西他赛联合使用的III期试验。这些试验的结果将在不久后公布。除了精确界定前列腺癌患者的疾病状态外,疫苗疗法与放疗、化疗和/或激素疗法的联合应用是看起来有前景且值得进一步研究的方法。