Nelson D V, Turner J A, McCreary C
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77021.
J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):533-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<533::aid-jclp2270470410>3.0.co;2-o.
This study (N = 115) compared the abilities of the Faschingbauer Abbreviated Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (FAM), the Midi-Mult, and the standard MMPI to predict response to conservative medical treatment for low back pain, as assessed by patient ratings of pain intensity 6 to 12 months later. The results indicated that all three inventory formats yielded significant correlations between the Hypochondriasis, Depression, and Hysteria scales and follow-up pain ratings. Less consistent findings were obtained with other scales and indices. The results provide tentative support for the clinical and research utility of these abbreviated MMPIs in substituting for the standard MMPI in outcome studies with back pain patients.
本研究(N = 115)比较了法申鲍尔简明明尼苏达多相人格调查表(FAM)、Midi-Mult和标准明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)预测腰痛保守治疗反应的能力,反应通过6至12个月后患者的疼痛强度评分进行评估。结果表明,所有三种量表形式在疑病、抑郁和癔症量表与随访疼痛评分之间均产生了显著相关性。其他量表和指标的结果不太一致。这些结果为这些简明MMPI在腰痛患者结局研究中替代标准MMPI的临床和研究效用提供了初步支持。