Suppr超能文献

老年人动态血压的价值:都柏林结果研究

The value of ambulatory blood pressure in older adults: the Dublin outcome study.

作者信息

Burr Marian L, Dolan Eamon, O'Brien Eoin W, O'Brien Eoin T, McCormack Patricia

机构信息

The Lewin Stroke and Rehabilitation Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2008 Mar;37(2):201-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm193.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) appears to be a more accurate predictor of cardiovascular outcome than blood pressure (BP) measured in the clinic setting in younger adults.

OBJECTIVES

the purpose of this study was to determine if ABPM predicted total and cardiovascular mortality independently of clinic BP and other cardiovascular risk factors in those aged 65 years and over.

METHODS

one thousand one hundred and forty-four individuals aged 65 and over referred to a single BP clinic had 24-h ABP measurement and clinic measurement at baseline off treatment. There were 385 deaths (of which 246 were cardiovascular) during a mean follow-up period of 6.7 years.

RESULTS

with adjustment for gender, age, risk indices and also for clinic BP, a higher mean value of ABPM was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The relative hazard ratio for each 10-mmHg rise in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 1.10 (1.06-1.18, P < 0.001) for daytime and 1.18 (1.11-1.25, P < 0.001) for night-time SBP. The hazard ratios for each 5-mmHg rise in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 1.05 (1.00-1.10, P = NS) for daytime and 1.09 (1.04-1.14, P < 0.001) for night-time diastolic pressure. The hazard ratios for night-time ABPM remained significant after adjustment for daytime ABPM.

CONCLUSIONS

ambulatory measurement of BP is superior to clinic measurement in predicting cardiovascular mortality in elderly subjects. Night-time BP is the strongest predictor of outcome in this age group.

摘要

背景

对于较年轻的成年人,动态血压(ABPM)似乎比在诊所测量的血压(BP)更能准确预测心血管疾病转归。

目的

本研究旨在确定在65岁及以上人群中,ABPM能否独立于诊所血压及其他心血管危险因素预测全因死亡率和心血管死亡率。

方法

1144名65岁及以上的个体被转诊至一家血压诊所,在基线未治疗时进行了24小时动态血压测量和诊所血压测量。在平均6.7年的随访期内,有385人死亡(其中246人死于心血管疾病)。

结果

在校正性别、年龄、风险指数以及诊所血压后,ABPM的较高平均值是心血管死亡率的独立预测因素。收缩压(SBP)每升高10 mmHg,日间的相对风险比为1.10(1.06 - 1.18,P < 0.001),夜间SBP为1.18(1.11 - 1.25,P < 0.001)。舒张压(DBP)每升高5 mmHg,日间的风险比为1.05(1.00 - 1.10,P = 无显著性差异),夜间舒张压为1.09(1.04 - 1.14,P < 0.001)。在校正日间ABPM后,夜间ABPM的风险比仍具有显著性。

结论

在预测老年受试者心血管死亡率方面,动态血压测量优于诊所血压测量。夜间血压是该年龄组疾病转归的最强预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验