Kremer Joel M, Gibofsky Allan, Greenberg Jeffrey D
Albany Medical College, 1367 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12206, USA.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;20(2):123-30. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3282f50eb1.
This review highlights the present state of efforts at registry implementation which exist internationally. These efforts are contrasted with those in the USA.
The implications of the different data which are derived from diverse registry sources are discussed. The need for long-term data from large and varied sources is fulfilled by registries that collect data from different populations. The potential differences in the nature of the data derived from these registries is dependent upon the national healthcare system from which they are derived, as there are significant differences in access to newer biologic agents which are inconsistent across countries.
Registry data are critical in order to develop an understanding of the performance and safety of new agents in the real world. The challenges for implementing a registry are manifold in the USA because of the somewhat chaotic nature of the healthcare delivery system. In order to overcome these unique challenges, registries in the USA need to be exceptionally well organized and funded, while maintaining independence from the pharmaceutical industry funding sources in the reporting and interpretation of data in peer-reviewed publications. Examples of these registries are provided and discussed.
本综述重点介绍了国际上登记处实施工作的现状,并将这些工作与美国的情况进行了对比。
讨论了来自不同登记处来源的不同数据的影响。通过从不同人群收集数据的登记处,可以满足对来自大量不同来源的长期数据的需求。这些登记处产生的数据性质的潜在差异取决于其所在的国家医疗保健系统,因为各国在获取更新的生物制剂方面存在显著差异,且各国情况不一致。
登记处数据对于了解新药物在现实世界中的性能和安全性至关重要。在美国,由于医疗服务体系有些混乱,实施登记处面临诸多挑战。为了克服这些独特的挑战,美国的登记处需要组织极为完善且资金充足,同时在同行评审出版物的数据报告和解释中保持独立于制药行业的资金来源。文中提供并讨论了这些登记处的实例。