Suppr超能文献

公共卫生登记处的评估与实施

Evaluation and implementation of public health registries.

作者信息

Solomon D J, Henry R C, Hogan J G, Van Amburg G H, Taylor J

机构信息

Michigan State University.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;106(2):142-50.

Abstract

A rapid proliferation of registries has occurred during the last 20 years. Given the long-term commitment of resources associated with registries and limited public health funding, proposals for new registries should be carefully considered before being funded. A registry is defined as a data base of identifiable persons containing a clearly defined set of health and demographic data collected for a specific public health purpose. Criteria for evaluating whether a registry is needed, feasible, or the most effective and efficient means of collecting a specific set of health data are presented. They include an evaluation of the stated purpose; a review of the function, duration, and scope of the registry; consideration of existing alternative data sources; an assessment of the practical feasibility of the registry; the likelihood of sufficient start-up and long-term funding; and an evaluation of the cost effectiveness of the registry. Creating a public health registry is a complex process. A range of technical and organizational skills is required for a registry to be successfully implemented. Eight requirements are identified as crucial for the successful development of a new registry. They include an implementation plan, adequate documentation, quality control procedures, case definition and case-finding (ascertainment) procedures, determination of data elements, data collection and processing procedures, data access policy, and a framework for dissemination of registry data and findings.

摘要

在过去20年中,登记处迅速增多。鉴于与登记处相关的资源长期投入以及公共卫生资金有限,在为新的登记处提案提供资金之前,应仔细考虑这些提案。登记处被定义为可识别人员的数据库,其中包含为特定公共卫生目的收集的一组明确界定的健康和人口数据。本文提出了评估是否需要登记处、登记处是否可行,或者登记处是否是收集特定健康数据集的最有效和高效手段的标准。这些标准包括对既定目的的评估;对登记处的功能、持续时间和范围的审查;对现有替代数据源的考虑;对登记处实际可行性的评估;获得足够启动资金和长期资金的可能性;以及对登记处成本效益的评估。创建公共卫生登记处是一个复杂的过程。要成功实施登记处,需要一系列技术和组织技能。确定了八项要求对新登记处的成功开发至关重要。它们包括实施计划、充分的文档记录、质量控制程序、病例定义和病例查找(确定)程序、数据元素的确定、数据收集和处理程序、数据访问政策,以及登记处数据和结果的传播框架。

相似文献

1
Evaluation and implementation of public health registries.
Public Health Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;106(2):142-50.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
6
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
10
Designing a sustainable national registry for stroke quality improvement.
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6 Suppl 2):S251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of minimum data set and electronic registry for hemodialysis patients management.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02914-y.
2
A brief examination of literature on adult cystic fibrosis: An emerging topic.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e41272. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041272.
3
Establishment of the Norwegian hearing register for children.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jul 29;18:1400005. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1400005. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of minimum data set and dashboard for monitoring adverse events in radiology departments.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 24;10(9):e30054. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30054. eCollection 2024 May 15.
5
The global landscape of kidney registries: immense challenges and unique opportunities.
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024 Jun;20(6):349-350. doi: 10.1038/s41581-024-00833-1.
6
A validation study of the 30-day questionnaire in the national Norwegian Tonsil Surgery Register: can we trust the data reported by the patients?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):977-984. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08306-0. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
7
High resolution data modifies intensive care unit dialysis outcome predictions as compared with low resolution administrative data set.
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Oct 11;1(10):e0000124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000124. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
The Pediatric COVID-19 Registry in Kuwait: Methodology and Results of Pilot Phase.
Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(5):471-479. doi: 10.1159/000524756. Epub 2022 May 20.
10
Data Challenges in Addressing Chronic Kidney Disease in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries.
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Apr 17;6(6):1503-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.03.901. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Registers and registries: a review.
Int J Epidemiol. 1973 Autumn;2(3):221-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/2.3.221.
4
Public health surveillance in the United States.
Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验