Suppr超能文献

正颌外科中压电截骨术的批判性评估:手术技术、失血量、时间要求、神经和血管完整性

Critical evaluation of piezoelectric osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: operative technique, blood loss, time requirement, nerve and vessel integrity.

作者信息

Landes Constantin A, Stübinger Stefan, Rieger Jörg, Williger Babett, Ha Thi Khanh Linh, Sader Robert

机构信息

Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Facial Surgery, Frankfurt University Medical Center, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;66(4):657-74. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.633.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Piezo-osteotomy feasibility as a substitute for the conventional saw in orthognathic surgery was evaluated regarding operative technique, blood loss, time requirement, and nerve and vessel integrity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients had orthognathic surgery procedures in typical distribution using piezosurgical osteotomy: 22 (44%) monosegment, 26 (52%) segmented Le Fort I osteotomies; 48 (48%) sagittal split osteotomies, 6 (12%) symphyseal, and 4 (4%) mandibular body osteotomies. Controls were 86 patients with conventional saw and chisel osteotomies: 57 (66%) monosegment, 25 (29%) segmented Le Fort I osteotomies, 126 (73%) sagittal split, and 4 (5%) symphyseal osteotomies.

RESULTS

Piezosurgical bone osteotomy permitted individualized cut designs, enabling segment interdigitation after repositioning. Angulated tools weakened the pterygomaxillary suture; auxiliary chisels were required in 100% of cases for the nasal septum, and lateral nasal walls as 46% pterygoid processes. After downfracture, the dorsal maxillary sinus wall and pterygoid processes were easily reduced. Hemorrhage was successfully avoided with average blood loss of 541 +/- 150 mL versus 773 +/- 344 mL (P = .001) for a conventional bimaxillary procedure. Sagittal mandibular osteotomy required considerable time (auxiliary saw in 13%); the lingual dorsal osteotomy was mostly performed tactile. Time investment remained unchanged: 227 +/- 73 minutes per bimaxillary standard osteotomy versus 238 +/- 61 minutes (P = .5); clinical courses and reossification were unobtrusive. Alveolar inferior nerve sensitivity was retained in 95% of the study collective versus 85% in the controls (P = .0003) at 3 months postoperative testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Piezoelectric osteotomy reduced blood loss and inferior alveolar nerve injury at no extra time investment. Single cases require auxiliary chiseling or sawing. Piezoelectric drilling for screw insertion and complex osteotomy designs may be developed to maintain bone contact or interdigitation after repositioning and minimize need for osteofixation.

摘要

目的

从手术技术、失血量、时间需求以及神经和血管完整性方面评估压电截骨术在正颌外科手术中替代传统锯的可行性。

患者与方法

50例患者接受了典型分布的使用压电手术截骨术的正颌外科手术:22例(44%)单节段、26例(52%)分段Le Fort I截骨术;48例(48%)矢状劈开截骨术、6例(12%)颏部截骨术以及4例(4%)下颌骨体部截骨术。对照组为86例接受传统锯和凿截骨术的患者:57例(66%)单节段、25例(29%)分段Le Fort I截骨术、126例(73%)矢状劈开截骨术以及4例(5%)颏部截骨术。

结果

压电手术截骨术允许进行个性化的截骨设计,使重新定位后节段能够相互交错。有角度的工具会削弱翼上颌缝;鼻中隔和外侧鼻壁100%需要辅助凿子,翼突46%需要。骨折下降后,上颌窦后壁和翼突很容易复位。成功避免了出血,传统双颌手术的平均失血量为773±344毫升,而压电手术截骨术的平均失血量为541±150毫升(P = 0.001)。下颌矢状截骨术需要相当长的时间(13%需要辅助锯);舌背截骨术大多靠触觉进行。时间投入保持不变:双颌标准截骨术每次227±73分钟,而传统手术为238±61分钟(P = 0.5);临床病程和骨再化情况不明显。术后3个月测试时,研究组95%的患者保留了下牙槽神经敏感性,而对照组为85%(P = 0.0003)。

结论

压电截骨术减少了失血量和下牙槽神经损伤,且没有额外增加时间投入。个别病例需要辅助凿骨或锯骨。可开发用于螺钉植入的压电钻孔和复杂的截骨设计,以在重新定位后保持骨接触或相互交错,并尽量减少骨固定的需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验