Mancini Antonio, Inchingolo Angelo Michele, Chirico Fabrizio, Colella Giuseppe, Piras Fabio, Colonna Valeria, Marotti Pierluigi, Carone Claudio, Inchingolo Alessio Danilo, Inchingolo Francesco, Dipalma Gianna
Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1158. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121158.
: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, benefits, and limitations of piezosurgery in tooth extractions compared to conventional methods. Piezosurgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, promoting better preservation of soft tissues and bone structures. Understanding its impact on postoperative outcomes such as pain, swelling, trismus, and bone healing is critical for its application in oral surgery; We restricted our search to English-language articles published between 1 January 2004 and 28 August 2024, in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The Boolean search keywords "piezosurgery AND tooth extraction" were used. A total of 983 articles were identified, and after duplicates were removed, 766 studies were screened. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven articles were selected for qualitative analysis. The literature suggests that piezosurgery offers advantages, such as reduced postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, despite longer surgical times compared to conventional methods. While piezosurgery shows promise for improved patient comfort and soft tissue preservation, further research is required to validate its long-term impact on bone healing and regeneration.
本系统评价的目的是评估与传统方法相比,压电外科在拔牙中的临床疗效、益处和局限性。压电外科已成为一种微创替代方法,能更好地保护软组织和骨结构。了解其对术后疼痛、肿胀、张口受限和骨愈合等结果的影响对于其在口腔外科中的应用至关重要;我们将搜索范围限制在2004年1月1日至2024年8月28日期间在PubMed、Scopus和科学网发表的英文文章。使用布尔搜索关键词“压电外科与拔牙”。共识别出983篇文章,去除重复项后,筛选了766项研究。应用纳入和排除标准后,选择了7篇文章进行定性分析。文献表明,尽管与传统方法相比手术时间更长,但压电外科具有术后疼痛、肿胀和张口受限减轻等优势。虽然压电外科在改善患者舒适度和保护软组织方面显示出前景,但需要进一步研究来验证其对骨愈合和再生的长期影响。