Gonçalves Joao Roberto, Cassano Daniel Serra, Wolford Larry M, Santos-Pinto Ary, Márquez Iris Malagoni
Pediatric Dentistry Department, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;66(4):724-38. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.007.
This study evaluated the affect of disc displacement and articular disc repositioning on stability after surgical counterclockwise rotation and advancement of the maxillomandibular complex.
A total of 72 patients (59 females, 13 males), with an average age of 30 years (range, 15 to 60 years) were evaluated. The patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (G1; n = 21), with healthy temporomandibular joints (TMJs), underwent double-jaw surgery only. Group 2 (G2; n = 35), with articular disc dislocation, underwent articular disc repositioning using the Mitek anchor (Mitek Surgical Products, Westwood, MA) technique concomitantly with orthognathic surgery. Group 3 (G3; n = 16), with articular disc dislocation, underwent orthognathic surgery only. Average postsurgical follow-up was 31 months. Each patient's lateral cephalograms were traced, digitized twice, and averaged to estimate surgical changes and postsurgical stability.
After surgery, the occlusal plane angle was decreased significantly in all 3 groups: by -6.3 +/- 5.0 degrees in G1, by -9.6 +/- 4.8 degrees in G2, and by -7.1 +/- 4.8 degrees in G3. The maxillomandibular complex was advanced and rotated counterclockwise similarly in all 3 groups, with advancement at the menton of 12.4 +/- 5.5 mm in G1, 13.5 +/- 4.3 mm in G2, and 13.6 +/- 5.0 mm in G3; advancement at the B point of 9.5 +/- 4.9 mm in G1, 10.2 +/- 3.7 mm in G2, and 10.8 +/- 3.7 mm in G3; and advancement at the lower incisor edge of 7.1 +/- 4.6 mm in G1, 6.6 +/- 3.2 mm in G2, and 7.9 +/- 3.0 mm in G3. Postsurgery, the occlusal plane angle increased in G3 (2.6 +/- 3.8 degrees ; 37% relapse rate) but remained stable in G1 and G2. Postsurgical mandibular changes in the horizontal direction demonstrated a significant relapse in G3 at the menton (-3.8 +/- 4.1 mm; 28%), the B point (-3.0 +/- 3.4 mm; 28%), and the lower incisor edge (-2.3 +/- 2.1 mm; 34%) but remained stable in G1 and G2.
Maxillomandibular advancement with counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane is a stable procedure for patients with healthy TMJs and for patients undergoing simultaneous TMJ disc repositioning using the Mitek anchor technique. Those patients with preoperative TMJ articular disc displacement who underwent double-jaw surgery and no TMJ intervention experienced significant relapse.
本研究评估了下颌关节复合体手术逆时针旋转和前移后,盘移位及关节盘复位对稳定性的影响。
共评估了72例患者(59例女性,13例男性),平均年龄30岁(范围15至60岁)。患者被分为3组。第1组(G1;n = 21),颞下颌关节(TMJ)健康,仅接受双颌手术。第2组(G2;n = 35),有关节盘脱位,在正颌手术的同时使用Mitek锚钉(Mitek Surgical Products,韦斯特伍德,马萨诸塞州)技术进行关节盘复位。第3组(G3;n = 16),有关节盘脱位,仅接受正颌手术。术后平均随访31个月。对每位患者的头颅侧位片进行描图、数字化处理两次并取平均值,以评估手术变化和术后稳定性。
术后,所有3组的咬合平面角均显著降低:G1组降低了-6.3±5.0度,G2组降低了-9.6±4.8度,G3组降低了-7.1±4.8度。所有3组的下颌关节复合体均类似地向前移位并逆时针旋转,G1组颏点前移12.4±5.5 mm,G2组为13.5±4.3 mm,G3组为13.6±5.0 mm;G1组B点前移9.5±4.9 mm,G2组为10.2±3.7 mm,G3组为10.8±3.7 mm;G1组下切牙边缘前移7.1±4.6 mm,G2组为6.6±3.2 mm,G3组为7.9±3.0 mm。术后,G3组的咬合平面角增加(2.6±3.8度;复发率37%),而G1组和G2组保持稳定。术后下颌在水平方向的变化显示,G3组在颏点(-3.8±4.1 mm;28%)、B点(-3.0±3.4 mm;28%)和下切牙边缘(-2.3±2.1 mm;34%)出现显著复发,而G1组和G2组保持稳定。
对于TMJ健康的患者以及使用Mitek锚钉技术同时进行TMJ盘复位的患者,咬合平面逆时针旋转的下颌前移手术是稳定的。那些术前有TMJ关节盘移位且仅接受双颌手术未进行TMJ干预的患者出现了显著复发。