Itoh Kazunori, Hirota Satoko, Katsumi Yasukazu, Ochi Hideki, Kitakoji Hiroshi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meiji University of Oriental Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Acupunct Med. 2008 Mar;26(1):17-26. doi: 10.1136/aim.26.1.17.
There is evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture treatment in knee osteoarthritis, but it remains unclear which acupuncture modes are most effective. We evaluated the effects of trigger point acupuncture on pain and quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients, compared with acupuncture at standard points, and sham acupuncture.
Thirty patients (27 women, 3 men; aged 61-82 years) with non-radiating knee osteoarthritis pain for at least six months and normal neurological examination were randomised to one of three groups for the study period of 21 weeks. Each group received five acupuncture treatment sessions. The standard acupuncture point group (n=10) received treatment at traditional acupuncture points for knee pain; the trigger point acupuncture group (n=10) received treatment at trigger points; and the third group (n=10) received sham acupuncture treatment at the trigger points. Outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analogue scale, VAS) and WOMAC index (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index). The groups were compared by the area under the curve method.
Five patients dropped out of the study because of lack of improvement, and one patient (in the trigger point acupuncture group) dropped out because of deterioration of symptoms; the remaining 24 patients were included in the analysis. After treatment, the trigger point acupuncture group reported less pain intensity on VAS than the standard acupuncture or sham treatment group, but both the trigger point acupuncture and standard acupuncture groups reported improvement of function of knee. There was a significant reduction in pain intensity between pre-treatment and five weeks after treatment for the trigger point acupuncture (P<0.01) and standard acupuncture groups (P<0.01) included in the analysis, but not for the sham treatment group. Group comparison using the area under the curves demonstrated a significant difference only between trigger point acupuncture and sham treatment groups analysed (P<0.025 for VAS, and P<0.031 for WOMAC).
These results suggest that trigger point acupuncture therapy may be more effective for osteoarthritis of the knee in some elderly patients than standard acupuncture therapy.
有证据表明针刺疗法对膝骨关节炎有效,但哪种针刺方式最有效仍不清楚。我们评估了激痛点针刺对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛及生活质量的影响,并与标准穴位针刺和假针刺进行比较。
30例(27例女性,3例男性;年龄61 - 82岁)非放射性膝骨关节炎疼痛至少6个月且神经学检查正常的患者被随机分为三组,研究周期为21周。每组接受5次针刺治疗。标准穴位针刺组(n = 10)在传统治疗膝关节疼痛的穴位接受治疗;激痛点针刺组(n = 10)在激痛点接受治疗;第三组(n = 10)在激痛点接受假针刺治疗。观察指标为疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分法,VAS)和WOMAC指数(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数)。采用曲线下面积法对各组进行比较。
5例患者因病情无改善退出研究,1例患者(激痛点针刺组)因症状恶化退出;其余24例患者纳入分析。治疗后,激痛点针刺组VAS疼痛强度低于标准针刺组或假治疗组,但激痛点针刺组和标准针刺组膝关节功能均有改善。分析中纳入的激痛点针刺组(P < 0.01)和标准针刺组(P < 0.01)治疗前与治疗后5周疼痛强度显著降低,假治疗组则未降低。采用曲线下面积进行组间比较,仅分析的激痛点针刺组与假治疗组之间存在显著差异(VAS,P < 0.025;WOMAC,P < 0.031)。
这些结果表明,在一些老年患者中,激痛点针刺疗法治疗膝骨关节炎可能比标准针刺疗法更有效。