Jiménez-Del-Barrio Sandra, Medrano-de-la-Fuente Ricardo, Hernando-Garijo Ignacio, Mingo-Gómez María Teresa, Estébanez-de-Miguel Elena, Ceballos-Laita Luis
Clinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad s/N, 42004 Soria, Spain.
Department of Physiatrist and Nursery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Calle Domingo Miral s/N, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 11;12(10):1575. doi: 10.3390/life12101575.
Osteoarthritis is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases. The main symptoms of the osteoarthritis have been linked to the presence of myofascial trigger points in the soft tissues. Dry needing (DN) is the most investigated technique for the treatment of myofascial trigger points. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of DN in pain and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis in the short-, medium- and long-term.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched in September 2022. Randomized controlled trials involving DN compared to non-pharmacological interventions, sham techniques or no additional treatment were selected. Quality of the studies was assessed with PEDro scale and risk of bias with Cochrane Collaboration tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed or random effects models according to the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.
Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 291 patients with osteoarthritis. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from fair to high. DN showed significant improvements in pain intensity (SMD = -0.76; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.29; I: 74%) and physical function (SMD = -0.98; 95% CI: -1.54, -0.42; I: 75%) in the short-term. No differences were found in the medium- or long-term. The risk of bias, heterogeneity, and imprecision of the results downgraded the level of evidence to very low.
Very low-quality evidence suggests a positive effect of DN for reducing pain intensity and improving physical function in the short term in patients with osteoarthritis. Further investigation is needed to determine a medium- and long-term effects.
骨关节炎是最常见的退行性关节疾病之一。骨关节炎的主要症状与软组织中肌筋膜触发点的存在有关。干针疗法(DN)是治疗肌筋膜触发点研究最多的技术。因此,本研究的目的是评估干针疗法在短期、中期和长期对骨关节炎患者疼痛和身体功能的有效性。
2022年9月检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、PEDro、科学网和SCOPUS数据库。选择了涉及干针疗法与非药物干预、假手术技术或不进行额外治疗比较的随机对照试验。采用PEDro量表评估研究质量,使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险。根据Cochrane干预系统评价手册,使用固定效应或随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,涉及291例骨关节炎患者。纳入研究的方法学质量从中等到高不等。干针疗法在短期内疼痛强度(标准化均数差= -0.76;95%可信区间:-1.24,-0.29;I² = 74%)和身体功能(标准化均数差= -0.98;95%可信区间:-1.54,-0.42;I² = 75%)方面有显著改善。在中期或长期未发现差异。结果的偏倚风险、异质性和不精确性将证据水平降至极低。
极低质量的证据表明,干针疗法对骨关节炎患者在短期内减轻疼痛强度和改善身体功能有积极作用。需要进一步研究以确定其在中期和长期的效果。